Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 771C910439 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86590 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2013 22:29:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 86534 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2013 22:29:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 86526 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2013 22:29:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:29:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.52] (HELO mail-bk0-f52.google.com) (209.85.214.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:29:55 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f52.google.com with SMTP id e11so1173786bkh.39 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:29:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Havc0efwmbUHWleJhjGV420/bKkdLWGZS46wJrpnGUk=; b=OD1yEMc9GO1AGdoJt2KocXWC13ZSHCXY3i4Qa1cT+wbHg+n2+4EzKOj8SfqRK1Rj1x 3S+xiJwsom9Av7OOo0WTB08FxKRFu+p5eIV+GEr0vl16NYgL6FLuhisdLubD+HTS8oBl d3sAn5JkHXux2366IaUbgz3Zu4e/j7bSRXSumeYjEBenWglDahOrUKg1hBHpRueL3VKf IObfw6jRuQ9S/Dh7csuopsGD2dqL9daLUeJdpN5x80CR/XYxEgW+OB0Y/xc+ar730qn2 O2XBZIJeKhx2pb1kS4I2umdnfN/dWVG8Gz7Cl8QIaEOoW/jXgUo+ejh6BJ+kTGoRzI+i oJZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.205.65.17 with SMTP id xk17mr7871770bkb.19.1380320974196; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.238.138 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:29:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:29:34 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lahh3uPHyFgUTVtErZQbOH_-jEo Message-ID: Subject: Re: 0.96 version in apache maven repo From: Stack To: HBase Dev List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5430e1658132504e7650571 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec5430e1658132504e7650571 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Sergey Shelukhin wrote: > Hi. > Who manages the snapshots that are published to Apache repos? > We do. Here is how to do it: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#maven.snapshot > I am looking at > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase/hbase-common/0.96.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT/ > and I see that this has some version built on Sep 9. > > Is -SNAPSHOT version it supposed to be updated by regular build? Are RCs > supposed to go there? > > Snapshots are just a snapshot. I did the above for Hive fellas who wanted to take a look at the tip of 0.96 branch. Some folks publish every successful build as a SNAPSHOT. We don't. Our shit too big. RCs go elsewhere. What Elliott said. I've been trying to doc' it of late here: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#maven.release The script in dev-release -- make-rc.sh -- does the bulk of the publishing. > Any objection to me publishing a recent build? > None. The make-rc.sh script should actually do it all for you -- just make sure you do ./dev-support/generate-hadoopX-poms.sh 0.96.0 0.96.0-hadoop1-SNAPSHOT ./dev-support/generate-hadoopX-poms.sh 0.96.0 0.96.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT first... so you have hadoop1 and hadoop2 poms. Scream if need help or doc needs fixing. St.Ack --bcaec5430e1658132504e7650571--