Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of andrew.purtell@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.177 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: andrew.purtell@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAHXxaiBkA8RLRegb-hmjYU9XNoxARLL5CqRA=b=Ym9T=+QLq-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+RK=_CBNs=ctL1nNAKy4omuFGAUGnq15JVNP6Ou3TjmARTgag@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHXxaiBkA8RLRegb-hmjYU9XNoxARLL5CqRA=b=Ym9T=+QLq-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:30:12 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CA+RK=_BmKc-tk5OtcSp+R17OLRSH8q43Kp8WCw7+FPzCr02MXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Branching for 0.98
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a914c0cab2204e69b0909

--047d7b3a914c0cab2204e69b0909
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Procedurally, to catch changes on the way to 1.0 that did not land in 0.96
- API cleanups (esp. with comparators), replacement of KeyValue with Cell,
inline Cell tags, HFile V3.

Not sure there is any "official message". What should it be do you think?


On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <sergey@hortonworks.com>wrote:

> What is the "official message"/purpose of 98? I was meaning to ask for some
> time, this thread might be as good a place as any.
> In a month after 96 release, people might not have even upgraded from 94 to
> 96 yet, now there's suddenly 98.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Unless there are concerns, I would like to set the date for branching
> 0.98
> > out from trunk at one month post the release date of 0.96.0. A RC can be
> > expected to follow within days, depending on the state of unit tests, the
> > availability of new 0.96 -> 0.98 upgrade compatibility testing developed
> > for the release, and the results of that compatibility testing.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>


-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

--047d7b3a914c0cab2204e69b0909--