hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase-0.96.0 release candidate is available for download
Date Mon, 09 Sep 2013 17:33:11 GMT
I will second Mr. Hsieh's concern for minimizing the impact of unnecessary
API and ABI changes via more intentional evaluation of said changes
(expressed on a different thread). He's done a great effort with that doc
of his, but it needs more eyes. I think we also need consensus on how much
code we're outright deleting for 0.96 and how much is simply being
deprecated. That decision is also driven by his doc. IIRC, he volunteered
to manage an umbrella ticket for this effort.


On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org> wrote:
> > So I posted an update in HBASE-9338[1].  For me this sinks the release
> > and I'm -1 biding until we can figure out what's causing this data
> > loss.
> >
> > Thanks Devaraj for testing. Good to know that others are also seeing a
> > failure.  If other could test too I would really appreciate it.
> >
> > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9338#comment-13760594
> Agree this is a sinker.  Will roll new RC soon as we figure it.  Meantime
> any other comments on this RC?
> Thanks,
> St.Ack

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message