Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52DFE108AA for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:15:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62620 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2013 17:15:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 62347 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2013 17:15:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 62335 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2013 17:15:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:15:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.42] (HELO mail-bk0-f42.google.com) (209.85.214.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:15:26 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id my10so340622bkb.1 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:15:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=8m1GznQXnrnb8N7yVdXnK+ziwoQnK1UjSxjWlDadBuQ=; b=d/vVUrpwlEPIfD6a9nvhMzXsEsqMKz5Sf3BJ5C//G879SqMIJGyr1uMwBSayfdKL0s A0SKOhkjLgz6WSMqE8xm15QgTiBoYXT7crar0sLnnqkONbb3XAtP2sSyRK99ZaiYQeFn Q1yojMVWyaKIN/fy8spHkAHVqYr7/wQ+EW2Q6NQyAhGJVXoCEcCQFwsACGDjWiiCaJ5u KIh1HYkRTx12UaeAGtNwBM+44jrQTet7fC0ClIWvv0iJEksCJFqrApYsXfzqYf83f7YT 7hJCWqYQpPYKEJCts4XxUGqOWHJLzOhI4rAykLioSNmORDdOVZ5MJDjZ+wx2Lq7sCYy6 S9+A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.204.65.9 with SMTP id g9mr330722bki.33.1377278106149; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.205.68.134 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:15:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1377150045.62804.YahooMailNeo@web140604.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:15:06 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yc7tIB-mSLVLvnZEDdL8S4rquEM Message-ID: Subject: Re: Thinking about 0.98 From: Stack To: HBase Dev List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3925a46552504e4a08c03 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c3925a46552504e4a08c03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Dan Burkert wrote: > As an interested bystander (user) I would love to see the reverse scan > feature (HBASE-4811 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4811)) > make 0.98. There has been a lot of talk about HBase indexes lately, and > the ability to reverse scan an index opens up a lot of possibilities. > Do you need it for you mysql'ing Dan? St.Ack --001a11c3925a46552504e4a08c03--