Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jon@cloudera.com designates
 209.85.128.169 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANZa=Gv9p1fK8+YikZUG40Q81pdK39piB2xiMeNh6+p6qZkN2g@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADcMMgH6yYMrZ7gTDANzjbAGMCYF2W6RKAn2vr4sXWnLa1sAHw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANZa=Gt4ES3zWOisW4PAT4GFOh71u5itf7kXoBpNeZUiqpPxuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADcMMgFOjanSQN3Q9urBR9UtiOSchskpsMz_n8CVyQGRFqttdw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPzbcGQxZaMdSFZKRFqDuvC5cqHV1hu9J=OJyYadEpw7UNSbDA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPQV63U3i1=ZK0WfB0h-pdt2x0ZmfZPG+QGCmjqkMChrr84Mbg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADcMMgH_=NFF0upU32VTj4pT7P3Uk_GERuSy6QKVK6saVwB=DA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAha9a3OtKnFLSW5p5P4gAiMMX9_28FNfWfH-4yWQQ+bBPKa2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANZa=Gv9p1fK8+YikZUG40Q81pdK39piB2xiMeNh6+p6qZkN2g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:38:10 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAAha9a33EJR2yt6xvfwQwb3KCUJ0R6yY+Yi9Gs-P8cK6UqKwCA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [UPDATE] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining
 issues
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115f682c5faa604e5064bd2

--089e0115f682c5faa604e5064bd2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hey nick,

If you want to take a look, 2/3 parts are good to review now:  (would like
opinion on the impact of the changes as well)

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9247
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9334

I'm working on deprecation shims and finding one more translation mistake
in part 3/3

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9359

Jon.


On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > I'd really like to get the api clean up (get KeyValue out of the
> > InterfaceAudience.public API).
> >
>
> I'm +1 for this if it's at all reasonably possible. Let me know if I can
> help with more than reviews, @jon.
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > > jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think this is not really a stopper. This can go on any subsequent
> > > > release, no?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Agree.
> > >
> > > That said, I'm pushing out 0.96.0RC0 till Weds. because of HBASE-9338
> > > (Integration tests should pass on any RC I'd say -- Elliott is on this
> > one)
> > > and the migration is missing a patch at least HBASE-9278 and HBASE-9110
> > --
> > > Himanshu is on these.  There are a couple of other uglies in the
> > criticals
> > > list that'd be no harm making the RC.
> > >
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> > // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> > // jon@cloudera.com
> >
>


-- 
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com

--089e0115f682c5faa604e5064bd2--