Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CAD810BA2 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 23:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47968 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2013 23:08:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 47911 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2013 23:08:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 47903 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2013 23:08:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 23:08:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of andrew.purtell@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.172] (HELO mail-vc0-f172.google.com) (209.85.220.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 23:08:50 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id m17so1483582vca.3 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:08:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=HPwCnh4+L5d87/2j0HSs73+xarup9bdi66KIEVYQRik=; b=IJnYMtxXd5kazIVDDfxoVGhJht2sbxGdM1AFi/AIR6lV01vJBbE2HUMB79yHyjz8jb 3zZXjLJl/QNV8PYhucgkM+WEGnXrvC5F2vbXbg2sKZR+06cqJD30qW24WszjPZjVyCcA qMDfBgewBcWJpZ0onADk/zDUZ+D8YIa+IM4UPq5V8rLxZEkU20rF1HlExkAIdp6+6x1W sNKnNNfQ+wkTnh30h7beCBGEjRtvYmz3cTaU0drZcespborLjhIc0DiSy8kkvQ26Vgae 5Q8Y9BFLtcWjhwPuH+MZZydwP70rQCWGZ+CP+EbU7Vcc8WWaIa+WUY+nDDwlP8WUuPNK xQDQ== X-Received: by 10.58.100.234 with SMTP id fb10mr13657611veb.5.1377212909599; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:08:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: andrew.purtell@gmail.com Received: by 10.59.7.129 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:07:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1377150045.62804.YahooMailNeo@web140604.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> From: Andrew Purtell Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:07:49 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FAThF9b5VwIblfLU3H_3VDB9XJA Message-ID: Subject: Re: Thinking about 0.98 To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a274641c64504e4915e3d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e013a274641c64504e4915e3d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Stack wrote: > It could come in then but would rather have it just come out in 0.98 since > it'll be a week -- maybe two (smile) -- behind 0.96? > True, it's kind of an academic exercise if 0.96 and 0.98 are on top of each other, could still be useful for proving our compatibility story. I was thinking early October for starting the 0.98.0 RC, so that's six weeks only. Could stick to that. Could push it out more. What's been discussed to land in 0.98 so far is tags / HFileV3, Jon's API improvements, and group placement. What else? -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) --089e013a274641c64504e4915e3d--