Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B22B610388 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 00:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5811 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2013 00:33:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 5741 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2013 00:33:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 5733 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2013 00:33:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 00:33:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ddas@hortonworks.com designates 209.85.128.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.169] (HELO mail-ve0-f169.google.com) (209.85.128.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 00:33:00 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f169.google.com with SMTP id m1so4403675ves.28 for ; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 17:32:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=9t6aTKI0T3oK4ybCfLXufoVs56FOiAXcTVpA95MWzAs=; b=Oyk4JGsCYEzxNCjL3hUvn4TgwQUDHlnozpSa4nUjX2XT+OjZPcQBuv6hgtdLbmW/Hh uNHop4V6fZcWQooc5M3BCTSIcYJGWdNMjpd1UECAtjlfTbw3G6JA8U39JprtBGKllzT5 KIix4NXLzFEc7SY5ArV+27yITOz3wwV63upCPc5SXhmfQ5C9p8WTrO4iKqp99HSz8BkL FUYFz2WNyVsZgBVgOIKxTVRbQfKg+Y2FX3J0B7/muaDAztJW0LhQn1HzY8CN8FEwNUqD vk20Km958P4WLRQf7qTFcnVjXCa/GUO3lESv2TQjqIMZhprH031HKYdVn3km0y202usW SEwQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.185.4 with SMTP id cm4mr10448315vcb.96.1372725159519; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 17:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.59.8.67 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 17:32:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 17:32:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues From: Devaraj Das To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2ddd281fac104e07c7b0b X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlZ3VPUd73t4rmQhjAh+DPzx8BQyopd3jzxmpvWowRu52/oocVIJAkT++BK0cv8fxLDgfK1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c2ddd281fac104e07c7b0b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Stack wrote: > > > That patch won't go in to hbase. > > > What if we and Hadoop can come up with a common RPC connection setup, like > PB-based SASL negotiation and a common version header? Then there are > options post-singularity. > > Hopefully, the HADOOP-9421 is a step in that direction. I am going to spend some time on HADOOP-9421. > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > --001a11c2ddd281fac104e07c7b0b--