Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC95210854 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3734 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2013 16:08:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 3678 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2013 16:08:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 3666 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2013 16:08:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:08:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_FRT_LOLITA1 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.128.175] (HELO mail-ve0-f175.google.com) (209.85.128.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:08:04 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f175.google.com with SMTP id da11so6272801veb.34 for ; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:07:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Bw0gzgyK3hv58iErunF5U0hM1uO/ZtdKwDLqoI2JE6U=; b=ShmQwCOyXbWw/NfR+FLBnD5aUhAvByk32pEddrwSwSSfZBRG5Sy0Vg4KzW3mORhW5H hp+pKT/9Z2gDxHnKwxvGA2s3wbzSoeYbLJFiXwKvzdxQlAgIJLEwszONmR+HDaYnJkhG SsLHuQvMvZNTty3ZJ9oGh0zJ1elULoJSSZnFMxlQqobc8EVPTU4srpvR6B/RueJ/SId8 WV5le/qzocOBBW7WqEBsWmRnjycIC5TgzxX6VXM9UwbJjUwvROS+xzHflxlZeS8NQ9ny FuVg+QVsANIY/v/Hn3o48S71iac3+7C9+ePogr4rMGJQXHSSemFwearITjM+UofSdGeB Bs9A== X-Received: by 10.52.35.109 with SMTP id g13mr9919146vdj.21.1374595643186; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:07:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.68.81 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:07:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1374269631.29536.YahooMailNeo@web140605.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1374269631.29536.YahooMailNeo@web140605.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:07:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.10 release candidate is available for download To: dev@hbase.apache.org, lars hofhansl Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3079baf205bace04e22ffddb X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmdmCEshq5qeyjWLDlsNpiuY1JMfRbtSJcXupHL1UGwPmERM6r54W8tqG/na9n0Hww+ZGOQ X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3079baf205bace04e22ffddb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Here we go ;) Downloaded, validated the signatures and uncompressed the files. => Passed. On the README.txt file, checked link for 6. => 404 page not found. since current directory doesn't exist, other links will fail too. Checked the CHANGE.txt file => Seems to be ok. Randomly checked the documentation => docs/bulk-loads.html point to an external page. Should it not be to a local one? Ran all tests => Passed. Started it, looked at the logs, the UI, all is fine. Ran PE, results similar between 0.94.9 and 0.94.10 (Numbers below are ms spent to run the test, average on 10 tests.) ||Test||0.94.9||0.94.10|| |org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$FilteredScanTest|2172297.6|2141379.4| |org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$RandomReadTest|2574442.3|2533646.4| |org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$RandomScanWithRange100Test|19098.3|19205| |org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$RandomSeekScanTest|154499.7|153022.8| |org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$RandomWriteTest|84760.2|85176.2| |org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation$SequentialWriteTest|43636.175|44185.7375| Did rolling restart on a 8 node cluster, restarted the master => Ok. Checked the logs and UI => Ok. Stopped master, configured balancer to default, merged a 71 region table into one single region => Ok. Major compacted the table, got it automatically splited to 2 regions, manually split it to 32 regions, waited for balancer => Ok. Stopped master again, reconfigured custom balancer, restarted, rebalanced => Ok. >From shell: Create table, scan, balance, drop => Ok. IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify still give strange results => REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855348 (Should be 10000000) Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList => Perfect. So a big overall +1 for me ;) Deployed in my "prod" cluster. Thanks all for this release. 2013/7/19 lars hofhansl > The 1st 0.94.10 RC is available for download at > http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.10-rc0/ > Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328 > > Like the previous point releases, 0.94.10 is a primarily a bug fix > release. This RC has 35 issues resolved against it: > [HBASE-8774] - Add BatchSize and Filter to Thrift2 > [HBASE-8819] - Port HBASE-5428 to Thrift 2 > [HBASE-8826] - Ensure HBASE-8695 is covered in Thrift 2 > [HBASE-8832] - Ensure HBASE-4658 is supported by Thrift 2 > [HBASE-8876] - Addendum to HBASE-8774 Add BatchSize and Filter to > Thrift2 - Add BatchSize Test > [HBASE-8938] - Thrift2 does not close scanner instance > [HBASE-8432] - a > table with unbalanced regions will balance indefinitely with the > 'org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.DefaultLoadBalancer' > [HBASE-8678] - Wrongly delete cells in some case which can not be > deleted > [HBASE-8695] - The HBase thrift service ignores XML configuration > [HBASE-8776] - tweak retry settings some more (on trunk and 0.94) > [HBASE-8782] - Thrift2 can not parse values when using framed transport > [HBASE-8794] - DependentColumnFilter.toString() throws > NullPointerException > [HBASE-8811] - REST service ignores misspelled "check=" parameter, > causing unexpected mutations > [HBASE-8814] - Possible NPE in split if a region has empty store files. > [HBASE-8858] - Backport hbase-6979 "recovered.edits file should not > break distributed log splitting" > [HBASE-8910] - > HMaster.abortNow shouldn't try to become a master again if it was stopped > [HBASE-8967] - Duplicate call to snapshotManager.stop() in > HRegionServer > [HBASE-8968] - Avoid call to zk in HRegionServer#getMaster() to log > the master address which already read from the zk. > [HBASE-8971] - Bump 0.94 version to 0.94.10-SNAPSHOT > [HBASE-8988] - Reuse the thread pool in the shell to not run out of > threads > [HBASE-8599] - HLogs in ZK are not cleaned up when replication lag is > minimal > [HBASE-8767] - Backport hbase-8001 and hbase-8012, avoid lazy seek > [HBASE-8806] - Row locks are acquired repeatedly in > HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation for duplicate rows. > [HBASE-8809] - Include deletes in the scan (setRaw) method does not > respect the time range or the filter > [HBASE-8847] - > Filter.transform() always applies unconditionally, even when combined in > a FilterList > [HBASE-8908] - Backport HBASE-8882 and HBASE-8904 (An Integration Test > to Test MTTR) to 0.94 > [HBASE-8921] - [thrift2] Add GenericOptionsParser to Thrift 2 server > [HBASE-8945] - Backport to 0.94: HBASE-7952 Remove update() and > Improve ExplicitColumnTracker performance. > [HBASE-8829] - Improve failed TestMetaScanner assert message so can > see where/why failure > [HBASE-7770] - minor integration test framework fixes > [HBASE-8885] - Fix and reenable TestGet failing#testDynamicFilter > [HBASE-8914] - [0.94] TestRegionServerCoprocessorExceptionWithAbort is > flaky > [HBASE-8928] - Make ChaosMonkey & LoadTest tools extensible, to allow > addition of more actions and policies. > [HBASE-8934] - > Fix bunch of flaky tests > [HBASE-8969] - Backport HBASE-8535+HBASE-8586 > TestHCM#testDeleteForZKConnLeak enhancement to 0.94 > > The list of changes is also available here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12324627 > > Here're the jenkins runs for this RC: > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94.10/1/ and > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94.10-security/1/ > > Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and > vote +1/-1 by July 26th on whether we should release this as 0.94.10. > > The release testing spreadsheet is available here: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdHRzYUcyYlU0NTVNQjFMenBCeDd5MVE#gid=0 > (if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so > that we can gauge the coverage) > > Thanks. > > -- Lars --20cf3079baf205bace04e22ffddb--