Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tucu@cloudera.com designates
 209.85.216.51 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu@cloudera.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 14:10:17 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAJs-t7PGAUkwyBDSywfxR5J3nVOovT8oum6aOBRZOEYaOddG1A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: change of jetty version (from 6 to 9) in hadoop, HADOOP-9650
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149cda472da7204e1067ad6

--089e0149cda472da7204e1067ad6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

HBase dev,

You may want to track this one.

thx

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alejandro Abdelnur <tucu@cloudera.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: Bringing Hadoop to Fedora
To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>


[moving bigtop to bcc]

Tim,
....
On HADOOP-9650 (not included in the above list):

Moving from Jetty6 to Jetty9 should be OK if there are not regressions. I
was chatting with ToddL about the issues we had before in and according to
Jetty guys they've been fixed in newer Jetty versions. Also, we are not
using Jetty for shuffle anymore (we use Netty), so Jetty is not 'stress'
that much anymore as it is used for the web UIs and for NN-SNN
checkpointing.

>From the patch some code changes are required, once that is take care we
should repeat the bullet item above for this patch.

In addition, we have to see how this will play with other projects like
HBase that are using HttpServer from hadoop-common. I'll forward this part
of the email to their dev@ so they can watch/jump-in if necessary in the
JIRA.

Thanks.


On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Tim St Clair <tstclair@redhat.com> wrote:

> Arun,
>
> I realize you're probably pretty busy (or on vacation), but I figured I
> would re-ping this thread to inquire about the status of the patch set
> listed below.?.?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9594
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9610
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9611
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9613
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9680 / 9623
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Arun C Murthy" <acm@hortonworks.com>
> > To: yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> > Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org, mapreduce-dev@hadoop.apache.org,
> hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org, dev@bigtop.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:54:11 PM
> > Subject: Re: Bringing Hadoop to Fedora
> >
> > Tim,
> >
> >  This is great! I'll take a look at some of these patches, welcome!
> >
> > Arun
> >
> > On Jun 11, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Tim St Clair wrote:
> >
> > > Greetings Hadoop Development Community,
> > >
> > > As some of you are aware, we've been looking to bring the upstream 2.X
> > > series into the Fedora channels.  We believe that there are several
> > > benefits that this can bring to the community:
> > >
> > > - Updated & streamlined rpm packaging
> > > - Deeper level of system integration
> > > - System managed dependencies (security + defect tracking)
> > > - Proving ground for OpenJDK7
> > > - Greater exposure for the community (both adoption and defect
> tracking)
> > > ...
> > >
> > > During our evaluation (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Hadoop
> ),
> > > we've come across some build issues as they relate to Fedora packaging
> > > guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java).  Most of
> these
> > > issues (listed below) are very minor dependency changes, and we were
> > > wondering if there are folks who would be willing to review.
> > >
> > > fedora-patch-math: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9594
> > > fedora-patch-collections:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9610
> > > fedora-patch-cglib: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9611
> > > fedora-patch-jersey: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9613
> > > fedora-patch-jets3t: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9623
> > > (uber deprecated)
> > >
> > > There are other patches we have in the queue but they still need to be
> > > flushed out, and in an effort to follow the KISS principles we figure
> this
> > > would be a good start.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Tim
> >
> > --
> > Arun C. Murthy
> > Hortonworks Inc.
> > http://hortonworks.com/
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Alejandro


-- 
Alejandro

--089e0149cda472da7204e1067ad6--