Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4919310D79 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 22:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55218 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2013 22:30:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 55159 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jul 2013 22:30:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 55148 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jul 2013 22:30:14 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 22:30:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vb0-f42.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username apurtell, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 22:30:14 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id e12so2450657vbg.29 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:30:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=AIMZavfgIr8rnl1ElISUbKEaxJEPKlUXlntX+kXfH4E=; b=KtXxjiXP4PsZc9wGVUiorNFVTQyMa2BUJhku7YIaOhhlO1uTCY4wXOEtBvJc7nqI6j W2WNh5yctcrfvrxiA/3JH3aMp56sVypvesT+mUQuJrak6h9io1kZ0mVRQ5WZbPHAin2V fNJMjcesX7OIUyqiz6BOL3kn3zZxAaCkvfYNN2m0WEPFZtibORQM0A7w4QQlHX3cq6Y9 xFapV49sOTsSAF9foYJYdZdW4MvksMGRx89aRgOrz/ntjxdjSIALmf+gM4ONgGBgEp+8 8H3OTzedr1PjUpAIqnZqYiW8qofYegU4m9ZZ6xuwCnrRlMrAk96OznGlPrrRCsed1/vq lemg== X-Received: by 10.58.76.130 with SMTP id k2mr27447909vew.24.1375223413067; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:30:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.59.7.129 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:29:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrew Purtell Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:29:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [UPDATE] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a86f606107e04e2c22708 --047d7b3a86f606107e04e2c22708 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Elliott Clark wrote: > And to say that HFileV3 can go in and still go 1.0. > Perhaps you can elaborate on the difference you see between HFileV3 and namespaces? Also, what if HFileV3 were not essential to what we are after ? -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) --047d7b3a86f606107e04e2c22708--