hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues
Date Thu, 18 Jul 2013 22:54:00 GMT
bq. Francis' namespaces is in need of review

I plan to review this feature.

The latest update to https://github.com/francisliu/hbase_namespace lagged
the last comment on HBASE-8015
I wonder if there are more significant changes to be made.

Cheers

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> STATUS
>
> +Build
>
> A few of us have been working on broke junit tests.  Progress is slow but
> steady.  Currently I am looking into zombie tests -- "all" tests complete
> but the build still fails.  Andrew Purtell has set me up w/ a clone box
> from his ec2 rig which is helping figure the zombie phenomenon.  I also
> just added our hadoopqa zombie detector up on apache trunk build to see if
> it yields clues at nkeywals' suggestion.  I also need to fix
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8764 so the ec2 integration
> test build passes (ec2 build runs integration tests which apache build does
> not)
>
> +Reviews
>
> Francis' namespaces is in need of review as are other 'Patch Available'
> criticals that we'd like committed such as Sergey's compaction changes.  If
> any volunteers are game, see the 'patch available' issues here [1].
>  Contrib appreciated.
>
> +Testing
> I know of at least one rig that is going up to do long-term hbase-it tests.
>  Any other testing going on that folks would like to talk up?
>
> +Migration
>
> Testing and finish documentation on moving from 0.94 pedigree to 0.96.
>  Still TODO.
>
> +Packaging
>
> Making it so we can publish an hbase 0.96 built against hadoop1 and
> hadoop2.  Still TODO.
>
> What else?
>
> I am still heading for end of July for a complete '0.96'.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
> 1.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12320040#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > I am shooting for end of July for 0.96 being 'complete'.   I would like
> to
> > make a 0.96 release in August.  We have some criticals outstanding but I
> > think we could ship even if these are not fixed in time (excepting
> > migration polish and of course remaining build fixes).  See [1.] for the
> > current list of issues.  Please re-prioritize issues as you see fit (or
> > better, move issues out of 0.95.2 if you do not think they will be done
> in
> > time).
> >
> > What to do with namespaces -- the last 0.96 'feature' -- given the above
> > timeline?  Currently it is a massive patch out on a branch.  It is still
> > not done, in want of review, and the author is going on holidays for a
> few
> > weeks soon.  My thinking as of now, going by the rate of change over the
> > last few weeks and estimating what is yet to be done, is that namespaces
> > will not make it.  I am willing to be convinced otherwise but that is how
> > it looks to me currently.
> >
> > I am going to start just disabling flakey unit tests in 0.95 from here on
> > out.  When folks get the itch, they can fix at leisure first on trunk and
> > then over in 0.95.
> >
> > What else?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> >
> > 1.
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12320040#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> >> (Changed the subject)
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I want to see initial data type APIs ship out with 0.95.2. A patch for
> >>> ordered byte serialization is up (HBASE-8201) and is nearing
> >>> steady-state.
> >>> However, sershe is the only person who's left feedback. I just posted
> an
> >>> early patch for the data type API itself (HBASE-8693). It should get
> some
> >>> eyes from all manor of interested parties, but I'll settle for folk
> from
> >>> Phoenix for now.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> It would be cool if Phoenix and Kiji fellows and any one else interested
> >> would weigh in and take a look see.
> >>
> >> This does not strike me as something we should hold up the release for
> >> though.  It looks like something that could go in at any time?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Should these tasks be escalated to criticals in order to grab
> attention?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I don't think that works going by past experience (and I don't think
> this
> >> a blocker on 0.96)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Additional comments inline.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> ...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Namespaces is the long pole and progress seems slow.  Do we hold up the
> >>> > release for them?  How can we hurry this effort along?  Swat team
> >>> descends
> >>> > on Y!?
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> It would be a shame to not get a decision on this in for 0.96.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Agree.  We need to get 0.96 out though.  It has been too long.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>  + Is anyone testing?  Integration tests fail on ec2 build from time to
> >>> time
> >>> > [2].  Our Elliott dug in on one of the failures a few days back and
> >>> found
> >>> > legit issue w/ no retry on admin tasks (I heart hbase-it tests).  Our
> >>> unit
> >>> > test story is better [3] but there are still the odd failures.
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> With the creation of the new list, noticing these issues is going to
> push
> >>> further back-burner. Nannying this stuff should retain focus. I'll
> >>> volunteer to track on these issues as I see them.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Thank you Nick.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Notice though that some of the more recent failures are caused by lack
> of
> >>> disk space on the Jenkins build host.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Oh.  Missed that.  Let me dig in.
> >>
> >>
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message