hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ramkrishna vasudevan <ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [UPDATE] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues
Date Mon, 29 Jul 2013 18:37:12 GMT
>>(My objection is the nomenclature -- if you have to do the
overloads to get in your tags, go for it)
We are trying to avoid this.  Will review internally and try to arrive at
an approach sooner.  And also at other comments.  Thanks Stack.

Regards
Ram


On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > Main objection is that the included v3 is not a 'green field'/redo so
> lets
> > not call it that
>
> We added minor version into hfile versioning (Broke things while doing
> it), so maybe it's better to call it 2.5 ?
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message