hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [UPDATE] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues
Date Mon, 29 Jul 2013 18:43:30 GMT
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Elliott Clark <eclark@apache.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > Main objection is that the included v3 is not a 'green field'/redo so
> lets
> > not call it that
>
> We added minor version into hfile versioning (Broke things while doing
> it), so maybe it's better to call it 2.5 ?
>

Works for me if that's the preference. Key is being able to switch on
something that might introduce new overheads only if tags are desired on
account of some use case that depends on them.

-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message