Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nkeywal@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.173 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADcMMgHiEwtdqE4eczjBNeGMqXCoT7fAFb2RrpRonMyA3=sMwg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADcMMgEyujEma62X0+MEm1VRgnH4UM=NxtvudxmsaQxW_yRvMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPcDmSviQnbnyNgq7EMDW+ibn-jYNaGAiF2+X7n0hFFrEbRJWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADcMMgHiEwtdqE4eczjBNeGMqXCoT7fAFb2RrpRonMyA3=sMwg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nicolas Liochon <nkeywal@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 03:12:29 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAPcDmSu5Pp-aqJChqpDEyD42GZDDka3SaO5akfJtV1U5XKCd0A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d57ce7866c904ded6984b

--047d7b5d57ce7866c904ded6984b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I've not tested the public release, only my own build. I also haven't
tested hadoop1.
I've got a test in progress, let me run it for a while and coming back to
you.

My general feeling from my previous tests is that this rc is much more
stable than 0.95.0 or trunk. But let's wait a little to confirm this.

In any case, we will need to have maven working for the RC2 imho. If it has
to be a file copy, well, let's do that.


On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> Thanks for testing Mr. Liochon.   Sounds like our mvn publishing needs a
> bit of work still around hadoop2 (hadoop1 works?).  You +1 on this as dev
> release?
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nkeywal@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've tried to test the hadoop2 maven release with ycsb.
> >
> > If I build hbase locally, with
> >  mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dhadoop.profile=2.0
> > then I can compile ycsb, providing 0.95.1 as the hbase version.
> > => Compilation & execution works.
> >
> > If I provide 0.95.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT (the version found in
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase,
> > but there is a bunch of files with different dates there)
> >
> > Then it builds, but I have a failure on execution.
> > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.getInputStream(Ljava/net/Socket;)Ljava/io/InputStream;
> >         at
> >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcClient$Connection.setupIOstreams(RpcClient.java:814)
> >
> > When I dig with mvn dependency:tree, I see hadoop2 dependencies only, as
> > expected.
> >
> > => Is that the version to use? If not, which one should I use, from which
> > repo?
> >
> >
> > As well, by default, we don't configure log4j, so we don't have anything
> on
> > screen: log4j does not output to screen by default for security reasons
> (if
> > the data is confidential). We should probably change this.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Nicolas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Here is our second 0.95.1 release candidate.  Should we put this out as
> > > 0.95.1?
> > >
> > > Since 0.95.1 is "just" a "Development" Series release [1], lets keep
> the
> > > vote period short.  Please vote by this Tuesday, June 11th.
> > >
> > > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
> > >
> > >   http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC1/<
> > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC0/>
> > >
> > > Almost 200 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.0 [2].
> > >
> > > All feedback is welcome.  We'd be interested in getting comments on
> > > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and
> of
> > > course,
> > > any bugs found.  I deployed SNAPSHOTs to maven and would particularly
> > like
> > > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
> > > palatable.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> > > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> > > 2.
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> > >
> >
>

--047d7b5d57ce7866c904ded6984b--