Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jxiang@cloudera.com
 designates 209.85.128.45 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOmV22uhicZmR4=5h0SpPFZMrKaNY8G6tJFNvouAYeRiAXSOYQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADcMMgEyujEma62X0+MEm1VRgnH4UM=NxtvudxmsaQxW_yRvMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPcDmSviQnbnyNgq7EMDW+ibn-jYNaGAiF2+X7n0hFFrEbRJWQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADcMMgHiEwtdqE4eczjBNeGMqXCoT7fAFb2RrpRonMyA3=sMwg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPcDmSu5Pp-aqJChqpDEyD42GZDDka3SaO5akfJtV1U5XKCd0A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOmV22uhicZmR4=5h0SpPFZMrKaNY8G6tJFNvouAYeRiAXSOYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:46:28 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAOmV22s99op0iFTrCMKjcy6fCXf_f7SNVGr6WPtuZJnXsJg_uA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95.1 release candidate 1 is available for download
From: Jimmy Xiang <jxiang@cloudera.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133dfa4ed225904dee8aa3c

--001a1133dfa4ed225904dee8aa3c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

My bad, in HBasePolicyProvider, this interface is referred as
RegionServerStatusService.BlockingInterface.class.  Some issue to link the
name together?


On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Jimmy Xiang <jxiang@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Have anyone tested the secure HBase?  I have some problem to get it work.
> For me, the region server could not connect to the master due to
>
> 2013-06-11 15:19:52,101 DEBUG [IPC Reader 6 on port 36000] ipc.RpcServer:
> Connection authorization failed: Protocol interface
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.RegionServerStatusProtos$RegionServerStatusService$BlockingInterface
> is not known.
>
> Is this some configuration issue, or an issue introduced by HBASE-8214?  I
> don't see this interface in class HBasePolicyProvider.
>
> Thanks,
> Jimmy
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nkeywal@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I've not tested the public release, only my own build. I also haven't
>> tested hadoop1.
>> I've got a test in progress, let me run it for a while and coming back to
>> you.
>>
>> My general feeling from my previous tests is that this rc is much more
>> stable than 0.95.0 or trunk. But let's wait a little to confirm this.
>>
>> In any case, we will need to have maven working for the RC2 imho. If it
>> has
>> to be a file copy, well, let's do that.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks for testing Mr. Liochon.   Sounds like our mvn publishing needs a
>> > bit of work still around hadoop2 (hadoop1 works?).  You +1 on this as
>> dev
>> > release?
>> >
>> > St.Ack
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nkeywal@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I've tried to test the hadoop2 maven release with ycsb.
>> > >
>> > > If I build hbase locally, with
>> > >  mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dhadoop.profile=2.0
>> > > then I can compile ycsb, providing 0.95.1 as the hbase version.
>> > > => Compilation & execution works.
>> > >
>> > > If I provide 0.95.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT (the version found in
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase,
>> > > but there is a bunch of files with different dates there)
>> > >
>> > > Then it builds, but I have a failure on execution.
>> > > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.getInputStream(Ljava/net/Socket;)Ljava/io/InputStream;
>> > >         at
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcClient$Connection.setupIOstreams(RpcClient.java:814)
>> > >
>> > > When I dig with mvn dependency:tree, I see hadoop2 dependencies only,
>> as
>> > > expected.
>> > >
>> > > => Is that the version to use? If not, which one should I use, from
>> which
>> > > repo?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > As well, by default, we don't configure log4j, so we don't have
>> anything
>> > on
>> > > screen: log4j does not output to screen by default for security
>> reasons
>> > (if
>> > > the data is confidential). We should probably change this.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > >
>> > > Nicolas
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Here is our second 0.95.1 release candidate.  Should we put this
>> out as
>> > > > 0.95.1?
>> > > >
>> > > > Since 0.95.1 is "just" a "Development" Series release [1], lets keep
>> > the
>> > > > vote period short.  Please vote by this Tuesday, June 11th.
>> > > >
>> > > > The release artifacts may be downloaded from:
>> > > >
>> > > >   http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC1/<
>> > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC0/>
>> > > >
>> > > > Almost 200 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.0 [2].
>> > > >
>> > > > All feedback is welcome.  We'd be interested in getting comments on
>> > > > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI,
>> and
>> > of
>> > > > course,
>> > > > any bugs found.  I deployed SNAPSHOTs to maven and would
>> particularly
>> > > like
>> > > > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is
>> > > > palatable.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > St.Ack
>> > > >
>> > > > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
>> > > > 2.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

--001a1133dfa4ed225904dee8aa3c--