Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93E77C34E for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 19:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98458 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2013 19:36:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 98286 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2013 19:36:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 98278 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2013 19:36:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 19:36:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of varun@pinterest.com designates 209.85.219.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.53] (HELO mail-oa0-f53.google.com) (209.85.219.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 19:36:19 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id k14so4021141oag.40 for ; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:35:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=JJVXmipnLI+l9MqIJC7adEqZ+tm1/GJWm+iPipE+al0=; b=A98iX/Evnx+iNPR2mj7smNxyyGwcyfWNk0BwpdOWAEnjhjB25/0iSSvTNltW00AbAD idsm1KWjCmgMOnwuig6P6VLl2Pi/VHgK44olEEAbwry+ytaFGPtQB0GtbzzMXvcrgg4y joAGyeQgKrH2c8K7pJFn3SvG1TnNktj0jbIoyB6koH15lcQIC4CpSTLL/0+SOmtaYYK4 KTsuG4nQRhe7iL93oNYi6WsI2cumkQKDX2tY54iPoM2nCW6HnL8cmGrT7IXTzDNO3yQZ yQXDemQZC9sjo2cDCVqBkk7x7MQKXlPrm4xQ0c+44JIrA5XLcQ0WeuW+7L6z71nbMIfU yv1A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.66.137 with SMTP id f9mr9747587obt.24.1372620957808; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:35:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.116.228 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:35:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:35:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Issues with delete markers From: Varun Sharma To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" , user@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160c35a9a0a7e04e064387d X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkmaln/8ZvKTbv9UinHq7PxWeZBZWd0n/17fojUsfTcXV5ELDvMA1BS0JMsIdreK2MzkNv9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0160c35a9a0a7e04e064387d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I tried this a little bit and it seems that filters are not called on delete markers. For raw scans returning delete markers, does it make sense to do that ? Varun On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Varun Sharma wrote: > Hi, > > We are having an issue with the way HBase does handling of deletes. We are > looking to retrieve 300 columns in a row but the row has tens of thousands > of delete markers in it before we span the 300 columns something like this > > > row DeleteCol1 Col1 DeleteCol2 Col2 ................... DeleteCol3 Col3 > > And so on. Therefore, the issue here, being that to retrieve these 300 > columns, we need to go through tens of thousands of deletes - sometimes we > get a spurt of these queries and that DDoSes a region server. We are okay > with saying, only return first 300 columns and stop once you encounter, say > 5K column delete markers or something. > > I wonder if such a construct is provided by HBase or do we need to build > something on top of the RAW scan and handle the delete masking there. > > Thanks > Varun > > > --089e0160c35a9a0a7e04e064387d--