Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of julian.zhou@me.com designates
 17.172.81.0 as permitted sender)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Message-id: <51870F73.8090006@me.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 10:03:31 +0800
From: Julian Zhou <julian.zhou@me.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328
 Thunderbird/17.0.5
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: Jetty migration from version 6.1.26 to 9 ??
References: <51839C33.60104@me.com>
 <CA+RK=_DJNTsZqgs5HCTFS_KpRMeko57OEjyY3k6c6QJkzE7vyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPQV63UCmxCz68NyEuzrq0xSM80UnhNhmrTmwSqv1uwHBE9ycQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+RK=_ACZfEcGcDQej6-bkPEBV_-BT_Fx6VOZUdQp6un1-aC0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAha9a0+LVG4LEvVinf+N1YgNb=enEToFYD8HHvkf7Qe0DRanA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: 
 <CAAha9a0+LVG4LEvVinf+N1YgNb=enEToFYD8HHvkf7Qe0DRanA@mail.gmail.com>

于 5/5/2013 2:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh 写道:
> +1. to standing pat.
>
> I know we've found problem in jetty in the past and what we have now is
> solid.
>
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> We can move when Hadoop does.
>>
>> HOWEVER, it should be the same version used by downstream or we will have
>> classpath issues.
>>
>> Furthermore, any refactoring from 6 to 7 may well need to be done through
>> shims in hadoop-compat modules unless all branches of Hadoop that we
>> support have a release that moves to Jetty 7 (or 9 or whatever).
>>
>> I think we should wait at least until Hadoop makes a move, or if there is a
>> critical reason to do otherwise on our own initiative.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
>> jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
>>
>>> There is some plans for Hadoop to move to Jetty 7.
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8515
>>>
>>> Will that impact us? Might be the opportunity to move HBase to 9?
>>>
>>> 2013/5/3 Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
>>>
>>>> I would say there has not been a volunteer yet willing to do that
>>>> refactoring and contribute it? Will updating our Jetty dependency cause
>>>> classpath conflicts with Hadoop core code that also uses jetty? We
>>> inherit
>>>> some of their servlets. Does that mean Hadoop core would also need to
>>>> update and refactor?
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, May 3, 2013, Julian Zhou wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is there any plan to migrate Jetty from version 6.1.26 (current
>> version
>>>>> in trunk) to version 9, which has been moved org.eclipse pkg? There
>> are
>>>>> lots of refactoring and new APIs for HTTP/Servlet/XML related in
>>> version
>>>>> 9, which might be able to benefit future HBase development and
>>> testcase.
>>>>> Thanks~
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards, Julian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>     - Andy
>>>>
>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>> Hein
>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>
>>     - Andy
>>
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>>
>
>
Thanks, Jon, Andrew and Jean's pointing out. Ok, yeah, there seems a 
workload if migrating to 7 or 7+ version. Standing pat and keeping eyes 
on hadoop's action makes sense.

-- 
Best Regards, Julian