Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7DDBF69B for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:40:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6831 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2013 15:40:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 6653 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2013 15:40:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 6630 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2013 15:40:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:40:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jon@cloudera.com designates 209.85.220.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.170] (HELO mail-vc0-f170.google.com) (209.85.220.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:40:50 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id lf11so708402vcb.15 for ; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:40:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=3ms6mUfydfwI1vnmkrWUBbBj8BVYTD4fxryRgG3Qd9E=; b=Qa6rMZRJRYy6tiJ/eRzWK1kajXIRTgmelhRmv5ExVRBu9uDYhtWdKGmpCiU9QGLdGB NGEAid8REotIMNUglN2mHo6AqwjGn8r1EikE8ALCtwzb1jtJHwA1Mb3RHzzmXIsulwyI rt/S+WCRApmGWr0w3oAyoGU8t4mDx2jyJRkDO6einK8/ujLZeZwdqxmcmRBvGYI+zrme UCyip7sz2nDozAseqhA/KWy9CcqH1eej6R9n96YCclBhzB2OZliUdRYuGkNXWNEYUEOG qQpKGDYHWFn3uBqSYwCV4yLSV4JecZeeZPqXoIbUhj+zaKwkns38L/VoEx+OjfRmd62O ulew== X-Received: by 10.220.228.74 with SMTP id jd10mr5101416vcb.65.1365090029462; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:40:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.190.34 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Jonathan Hsieh Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:40:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Marking fix version To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9ccd5164b8bbf04d98acaa8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnXL32UgN5peOoegW0phT0DtFtok87hbYYbb4OEXT+Z1TrT4rx24X1ttlbZpaJlT+hllmGW X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --14dae9ccd5164b8bbf04d98acaa8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey all, I just wanted to make sure we are on the same page here when we committing code and that we are consistent when marking fix version in the jira. Its pretty important that we get this right because our release notes are generated from these as of 0.94. Here's what I'm doing and suggesting Commit only to trunk: Mark with 0.98 Commit to 0.95 and trunk : Mark with 0.98, 0.96, and 0.95.x Commit to 0.94.x and 0.95, and trunk: Mark with 0.98, 0.96, 0.95.x, and 0.94.x Commit to 89-fb: Mark with 89-fb. Commit site fixes: no version My understanding is that 0.96 will be a branch off of 0.95 -- so any fix to 0.95 is a fix to 0.96 until 0.96 branches. Thanks, Jon. -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // jon@cloudera.com --14dae9ccd5164b8bbf04d98acaa8--