hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jimmy Xiang <jxi...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues
Date Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:10:37 GMT
+1 on flaky category.  I filed HBASE-8256 to work on it.  For those flaky
tests, we can have a separate Jenkin build for it.

Thanks,
Jimmy

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:

> I only suggest a category to toggle on or off for flaky tests. Let's just
> discuss that first. That seems easy to set up. Then we don't have to commit
> changes just to run them on Jenkins.
>
> The point here seems to be segregate flaky tests and fix them, not leave
> them in a broken state, nor introduce weird "pass once in a while" new
> criteria.
>
> On Wednesday, April 3, 2013, Ted Yu wrote:
>
> > Jean-Marc's idea is interesting.
> > The tests in this 'flaky' category should succeed, say, once in 5
> > consecutive builds.
> > If particular test fails consistently after a checkin, we should
> > investigate further.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > jean-marc@spaggiari.org <javascript:;>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Or even always have them running in this new category but if one of
> > > them fails,not tag the build as a fail? That way we can continue to
> > > keep an eye on them but they are not turning the builds red?
> > >
> > > 2013/4/3 Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org <javascript:;>>:
> > > > Could we introduce a junit category for flakey tests such that they
> > don't
> > > > run unless we activate them with some flag to maven?
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, April 2, 2013, Stack wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> > > <javascript:;>>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > > - HBASE-7897 Add support for tags to Cell Interface
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I think one of us over here could pick this up, let me ask.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > - Unit test fixes
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I have some stuff due by the 12th. After that I aim for green
> trunk
> > > and
> > > >> > 0.94 builds on 54.241.6.143, including the Hadoop 2 ones. Will
put
> > on
> > > my
> > > >> > hip boots.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> I like Jimmy's suggestion from another thread where we just back out
> > all
> > > >> flakey tests and roll them in one at a time into a build that is
> > usually
> > > >> blue rather than always red so we can figure which tests and code
> > > >> destabilize.
> > > >>
> > > >> St.Ack
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >    - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message