hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jimmy Xiang <jxi...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Working on assemblies for 0.95
Date Thu, 21 Mar 2013 23:19:08 GMT
At first, I prefer separated binary jar and source jar, because we don't
need to the source jar in most cases.

As to hadoop, how about we ship two: one with hadoop1, the other with
hadoop2?

Thanks,
Jimmy

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:

> There you go again, ignoring my email :p
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > I've started in on assemblies for 0.95.  I have a few questions looking
> at
> > what we currently have.
> >
> > Here is what it looks like when you untar it:
> >
> > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff  261312 Mar 18 09:27 CHANGES.txt
> > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff   11358 Mar 18 09:27 LICENSE.txt
> > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff     897 Mar 18 09:27 NOTICE.txt
> > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff    1377 Mar 18 09:27 README.txt
> > drwxr-xr-x  27 stack  staff     918 Mar 18 09:27 bin
> > drwxr-xr-x   9 stack  staff     306 Mar 20 22:37 conf
> > drwxr-xr-x  12 stack  staff     408 Mar 19 15:23 dev-support
> > drwxr-xr-x  67 stack  staff    2278 Mar 21 12:12 docs
> > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:12 hbase-client
> > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:12 hbase-common
> > drwxr-xr-x   6 stack  staff     204 Mar 21 12:13 hbase-examples
> > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:13 hbase-hadoop-compat
> > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:13 hbase-hadoop1-compat
> > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:13 hbase-it
> > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:12 hbase-prefix-tree
> > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:12 hbase-protocol
> > drwxr-xr-x   4 stack  staff     136 Mar 21 12:13 hbase-server
> > drwxr-xr-x   7 stack  staff     238 Mar 21 12:13 hbase-webapps
> > drwxr-xr-x  68 stack  staff    2312 Mar 21 14:24 lib
> > drwxr-xr-x   5 stack  staff     170 Mar 21 14:25 logs
> > -rw-r--r--   1 stack  staff   66716 Mar 21 09:55 pom.xml
> > drwxr-xr-x   6 stack  staff     204 Mar 18 09:27 src
> >
> >
> > The src dir and the hbase-* module dirs have src in them.  We should
> > probably have the src all in one place.  I'm thinking that we should
> have a
> > hbase-0.95*-bin.tar.gz and a hbase-0.95-src.tar.gz.  And release them
> > together.  When you untar the src over the bin you will get something you
> > can build if you wanted to (so pom.xml would be over in src).  Any
> > preferences?
> >
> > I need to go through the lib dir and purge the transtiive includes we
> don't
> > need.  Its a pain figuring what we do and do not need.  Useful making the
> > evaluation are the fancy hbase-it tools that have been coming in; I can
> run
> > suite of tests w/ the runtime and see what breaks.  For hbase-it tests to
> > work, it looks like junit needs to be included as a runtime dependency.
>  We
> > ok w/ that?
> >
> > What shall we ship?  A single hbase that defaults to hadoop1?  Or we
> build
> > a hadoop2 too and ship a binary that includes hadoop2 also?
> >
> > Your Release Manager,
> > St.Ack
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message