hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ramkrishna vasudevan <ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.94 automated tests
Date Sat, 16 Mar 2013 09:07:19 GMT
Agreed Lars.  +1.

Regards
Ram

On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:06 AM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org> wrote:

> I don't think so.
>
> Let's be smart about this; we can look at a patch and see whether we need
> a full test run or not.
>
>
> -- Lars
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 12:14 PM
> Subject: Re: 0.94 automated tests
>
> In case of patch that only involves changes to test(s), such as HBASE-8106,
> is full test run required ?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > I think that fine for getting something into our current 'stable'
> offering.
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:46 AM, lars hofhansl <larsh@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Ubuntu 3 is currently down. It used to be our most reliable test
> > > environment.
> > > Until that is fixed I would like to propose requiring a full test run
> > > before anything is committed to 0.94.
> > >
> > > Comments/Concerns? This is pretty annoying, but I do not see any way
> > > around this.
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Lars
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message