Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-33627-apmail-hbase-dev-archive=hbase.apache.org@hbase.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45BBCEBE3
	for <apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:14:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 62166 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2013 16:14:43 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 61949 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2013 16:14:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@hbase.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@hbase.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@hbase.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.hbase.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 61930 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2013 16:14:41 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:14:41 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jesse.k.yates@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.49 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.212.49] (HELO mail-vb0-f49.google.com) (209.85.212.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:14:34 +0000
Received: by mail-vb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id s24so1778931vbi.36
        for <dev@hbase.apache.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:14:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type;
        bh=Mj77G5IepIy48T5tU95Tduu+ieooWKfBPjluB4AdZSA=;
        b=TxQCajKVdR0PHokHZZB+s9Qt32RCSdgQX2l16u3jZxiHeYO/ixGV392miJSU2QomWZ
         z8j2BwvIX1qzXkwwkKYaRMeUTELrkahcrc4SBt7ROx4w2wN8Ue1D1wDGJ/LkrFcSpJ3b
         NCEWNTKlW2jIfR9MlCw117mRbxvbsEl1ivShiBuGrk7F19jr4mcgWC6ImxwE8okiLUbp
         0HgpkgI7TGsSchsKzm6i7w6d6rnCwbSUN45wxcT5Rvd4oeImIAdoTdmkCKD5+VVP46he
         MDLoyIriyVCFpejXrh2bMJpk3GuTY8Cx4rz1tQJDpuivfPIQEPDzGC8/Ktyk2qwN08h3
         E85Q==
X-Received: by 10.221.9.136 with SMTP id ow8mr9836945vcb.58.1361808853715;
 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:14:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.143.114 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:13:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPcDmSuS051CKFhD8NtsR+qNne8JdF_8ujj=tjKDto9c4LBg9Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAAT7MkoJ7f=3dwZ9ak9pOqvcuiuEgNjcfEFAmMOaP-BZc8Ugkw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPcDmSufD7H7UwMoqp5-JUc2-bYxuAZYoa2UHwasKUYeH72+XQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAT7Mkpc27GyE_4qM4+ZPfbNgT3GHLj-U=qH74pRa+cBkCHXCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPcDmSuS051CKFhD8NtsR+qNne8JdF_8ujj=tjKDto9c4LBg9Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jesse Yates <jesse.k.yates@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:13:53 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAB5sDNJjEg=Xz8kviVPcZ=dZ3Ot3a1E2hMBEkF=mv5PkK_WfbA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Artifact id for HBase - trunk
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54a383efa4aa804d68ed4fd
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--bcaec54a383efa4aa804d68ed4fd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I don't think you need a patch (not sure what Nicholas was commenting on
WRT to Elliots work here) - that's the way mutli-module maven projects work
AFAIK. Hopefully, when Elliot does finish the client module though, pulling
in just hbase-client and hbase-common (for client side stuff) will be
natural (as opposed to the current where you need all the modules for the
client, including hbase-server).

It might be nice though to have a meta artifact that's just
hbase-<VERSION>. I did something similar for Phoenix where you basically
can build a single jar with all the dependent, compiled sources rolled into
the jar (as opposed to a jar of jars), so we could consider something like
that too.

-Jesse
-------------------
Jesse Yates
@jesse_yates
jyates.github.com


On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Nicolas Liochon <nkeywal@gmail.com> wrote:

> I understood that Elliot is working on this subject, but I don't know
> exactly what he's targeting. Just that it will be ready very soon...
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:51 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks N.
> >
> > So should we change something in the pom.xml for trunk and commit it as
> > part of HBase.  If so i will raise a JIRA for the same.
> >
> > Regards
> > Ram
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nkeywal@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > You're just right, Ram :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:17 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> > > ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi devs
> > > >
> > > > I am just learning this maven.  So i came across this and not sure
> > > whether
> > > > am right.
> > > >
> > > > In the current trunk we say the artificat id as 'hbase'.
> > > >
> > > > But when we build the 0.95 SNAPSHOT the jar actually falls under
> > > > hbase-server.
> > > >
> > > > So if i have an external project and need to refer to the latest
> > > snapshot i
> > > > need to make it the artificat id as 'hbase-server' rather than
> 'hbase'
> > as
> > > > how we used to do.
> > > >
> > > > Changing this will help me pick up the snapshot jar.
> > > >
> > > > Is what am saying is right?  Pls do correct me if am wrong.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Ram
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

--bcaec54a383efa4aa804d68ed4fd--