Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86A96E383 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41480 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2013 01:13:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 41210 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2013 01:13:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 41199 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2013 01:13:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:13:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alex.baranov.v@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.44] (HELO mail-vb0-f44.google.com) (209.85.212.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:12:55 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fr13so4770784vbb.3 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:12:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=QilJSYA/aUaOPQVjUFVEG1zndb8kV/uJdFaGKnS1MjM=; b=hDr+Jaycy2O/CcnRCRwdM1Lf4HFLOdt8bHJOmaoSb5VMWPK3fGNZZxlniZ6aw4QARZ fwa/tid9XX1m6EhKUgzwUqddkbyWKMAoQ1K3Q6ExxwQ3oZKDoOjscat+CPL0daONMtLj RjUGK/7uMTsF1Q2eUwwxz3IMZ1GMuMc2JyvlwUxmoUcwCooRi/OGFqVmpi9yPjIHw8n9 rkBpke8vqlE9yANF95huDE3rPDAxJmpdoZ1NkthuNlyZcJ91JNaE/ivqVIoh0DFvE10Z a9QX1xwsNDMFZ9meujkKgxzAHu8aWskIUec3E9QbLoUUH7b9yyJXDqcYtNSc2IRH+ENL 7UbQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.37.166 with SMTP id z6mr20616644vdj.55.1361322754262; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:12:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.124.131 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:12:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:12:34 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Label for JIRAs with patches that are "almost there" From: Alex Baranau To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51d2c3a31467b04d61da7de X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec51d2c3a31467b04d61da7de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sorry guys I had leave early (the dev powwow). On the bright side (?) while I was walking back to the office this is an idea I got about getting patches in (and JIRAs closed). Will it help to have a special label that reviewer can add to JIRA issue iff: * the patch is in such a good shape and there are just minor things left that even reviewer can adjust to make it committable. This might help to close those issues that can be closed quickly (and that don't get attention because guys are busy looking at not-so-ready patches and because patch provider disappeared). But not sure. Alex Baranau --bcaec51d2c3a31467b04d61da7de--