Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP+2gDr=DM+_+7f3Zx_rPZ9FEVwjyRgFYdkEL8tNqY_JE_=fKg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1360356334.13051.YahooMailNeo@web140604.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<CADcMMgGpTnYe1wU683PhakDwodEWR=g4OvuWqdukF0ZWswvn3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALvzVW36OEYS4XMexRBEE5ZiUuOfj1PePpvy6eRqebwLu4hQQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP+2gDr=DM+_+7f3Zx_rPZ9FEVwjyRgFYdkEL8tNqY_JE_=fKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:45:53 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CA+RK=_CmiNhHASEHNw=-FjEDLr9UGsrJTU8J1Y6QY1YfzcuX8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE} The 2nd hbase 0.94.5 release candidate is available
 for download
From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>, adityakishore@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54a3800ac5f8a04d5b481bd

--bcaec54a3800ac5f8a04d5b481bd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

That's impressive. Can we bottle that test? :-)

+1 from me too, but I was currently only able to check the basics on a
single node.

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Aditya <adityakishore@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
> 11 nodes cluster, 50 tables (1GiB-2TiB), >5K regions.
> Cluster upgraded through 0.90.6 -> 0.92.2 -> 0.94.5-rc1
> YCSB, PE, with induced fault.
>
> Everything seem to be in order.
>

-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

--bcaec54a3800ac5f8a04d5b481bd--