hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jonathan Hsieh <...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Snapshots branch trunk merging
Date Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:27:03 GMT
You could do that, or apply the mega patch to trunk, at this point.

commit a35267ff2ab727c72493df160b8c03da05a1547d
Author: Michael Stack <stack@apache.org>
Date:   Tue Feb 12 18:17:34 2013 +0000


On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari
<jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> If I want to give it a try, do I "simply" have to extract for the GIT
> link you sent and build from there?
> JM
> 2013/2/12, Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com>:
>> Hey all,
>> We did a branch merge of the snapshot branch (hbase-6055 and
>> hbase-7290 combined) with trunk on 2/1/13.  This merge initially had
>> several always broken tests but  since then Ted, Matteo and myself
>> fixed all the always-broken unit tests.  I've merged again today
>> 2/12/13 [1], and posted a patch on HBASE-7290 for the hadoopqa bot to
>> run.
>> There are primarily four of us who worked on this branch -- Jesse Y,
>> Matteo, Ted Yu and myself, so if we each +1, technically we would have
>> the 3 +1's required and could merge.  I wanted to solicit +1's from
>> the four who worked  on it (all committers now) and also find out if
>> anyone else has started reviewing the code or intends to in the next
>> few days.  It is a large patch (1.3MB) that I can post on review
>> board, but it may be easier to understand by going to the different
>> individual jiras (some of which have design docs).   Generally we've
>> been using a looser of review then commit for each of the subtasks. If
>> I get clean test runs from the QA bot and +1's from the folks who
>> worked on it or planned on reviewing it, I'd like merge sooner rather
>> than later.
>> On the unit testing front, I've personally gotten one error-free unit
>> tests runs runs and one with a failure in hbase-examples:
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.example.TestBulkDeleteProtocol.testBulkDeleteFamily.
>> On the system testing side, I've been testing the pre-merge version
>> outlined by Aleks [2] and it had been fairly robust on a 5 node
>> cluster with fault injection.  I've also done some testing on a 20
>> node cluster (no fault injection) and a few runs on a 100 node cluster
>> where the snapshoting feature has been robust.
>> Thanks,
>> Jon.
>> [1] https://github.com/jmhsieh/hbase/tree/snapshot-merge-0212
>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/pdbkq654ipuxyt6a
>> --
>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
>> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
>> // jon@cloudera.com

// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com

View raw message