hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Artifact id for HBase - trunk
Date Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:49:43 GMT
Might be nice to have an assembly target that produces an uber jar.


On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Jesse Yates <jesse.k.yates@gmail.com>wrote:

> I don't think you need a patch (not sure what Nicholas was commenting on
> WRT to Elliots work here) - that's the way mutli-module maven projects work
> AFAIK. Hopefully, when Elliot does finish the client module though, pulling
> in just hbase-client and hbase-common (for client side stuff) will be
> natural (as opposed to the current where you need all the modules for the
> client, including hbase-server).
>
> It might be nice though to have a meta artifact that's just
> hbase-<VERSION>. I did something similar for Phoenix where you basically
> can build a single jar with all the dependent, compiled sources rolled into
> the jar (as opposed to a jar of jars), so we could consider something like
> that too.
>
> -Jesse
> -------------------
> Jesse Yates
> @jesse_yates
> jyates.github.com
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Nicolas Liochon <nkeywal@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I understood that Elliot is working on this subject, but I don't know
> > exactly what he's targeting. Just that it will be ready very soon...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:51 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> > ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks N.
> > >
> > > So should we change something in the pom.xml for trunk and commit it as
> > > part of HBase.  If so i will raise a JIRA for the same.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Ram
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Nicolas Liochon <nkeywal@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > You're just right, Ram :-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:17 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> > > > ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi devs
> > > > >
> > > > > I am just learning this maven.  So i came across this and not sure
> > > > whether
> > > > > am right.
> > > > >
> > > > > In the current trunk we say the artificat id as 'hbase'.
> > > > >
> > > > > But when we build the 0.95 SNAPSHOT the jar actually falls under
> > > > > hbase-server.
> > > > >
> > > > > So if i have an external project and need to refer to the latest
> > > > snapshot i
> > > > > need to make it the artificat id as 'hbase-server' rather than
> > 'hbase'
> > > as
> > > > > how we used to do.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changing this will help me pick up the snapshot jar.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is what am saying is right?  Pls do correct me if am wrong.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > Ram
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message