hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Devaraj Das <d...@hortonworks.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Sorting out issues for 0.96 for (eventual) release
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:01:58 GMT
I'll run some system tests on a cluster. Will update by tonight or tomorrow.

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:
> Right, it's historical. 0.95 would be implicitly a beta release. Calling it
> 0.96-beta would mean the same thing but different from what we did before
> (0.89 ahead of 0.90 as a "developer preview", which of course became much
> more than that over at FB, but that's another story).
>
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I lack the context here, whether why we have adopted the linux's odd/even
>> naming convention. Anyone kind enough to remind us again? It does not
>> matter that much whether we go with 0.95.0-beta or 0.96.0-beta,
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)

Mime
View raw message