hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jonathan Hsieh <...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Sorting out issues for 0.96 for (eventual) release
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:55:23 GMT
I think that branching scheme makes sense.

We should probably define the intent of even/odd versioning and compat
rules on the webpage (the how to release instructions and on the
download links) if we are going to do it so we don't have to explain
it over and over.  If we do this ahead of time,  everyone should have
the same expectations knows what this means.

Also, we could consider probably playing some games with adding -dev
or -beta after an odd version number.  I say this with some
trepidation - over in Hadoop-land they there are some contentious
discussions about version numbering and naming that I'd personally
like to avoid.

Jon.

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> How do we want to run it?  Branch 0.96 and then 0.95s are branched from
>> 0.96?  (As in the past, 0.95.0, 0.95.1, etc., would come with no guarantees
>> other than it basically works and it is allowed that 0.95.1 may not be
>> compatible with 0.95.0, etc.).
>>
>
>
> +1
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)



-- 
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// jon@cloudera.com

Mime
View raw message