hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Sorting out issues for 0.96 for (eventual) release
Date Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:12:59 GMT
Right, it's historical. 0.95 would be implicitly a beta release. Calling it
0.96-beta would mean the same thing but different from what we did before
(0.89 ahead of 0.90 as a "developer preview", which of course became much
more than that over at FB, but that's another story).

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis.soz@gmail.com> wrote:

> I lack the context here, whether why we have adopted the linux's odd/even
> naming convention. Anyone kind enough to remind us again? It does not
> matter that much whether we go with 0.95.0-beta or 0.96.0-beta,

Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message