Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A51559A77 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 00:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28589 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2012 00:48:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 28526 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2012 00:48:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 28518 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2012 00:48:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:48:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.41] (HELO mail-bk0-f41.google.com) (209.85.214.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:48:31 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f41.google.com with SMTP id jg9so3529734bkc.14 for ; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:48:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=674+9h4PzZSYv3GiWVIrA6SvF4dKcZ4H354RzkVVzOM=; b=algbN+rbdOf0WGdxseIlA+otkbfIhmjEd9RvXpaIoWQ9qDqAZWs3hqZ8MwEjJ7+GtI 2jtye5MjIROBUGX80vkZGqTl6jdRBOTyqjZEq8svtEJYLpF04WaAw5jrwn6kZsheH9sW t/EIrwHpCV+HmOR8N92LDcYMVQGcY3Zeq56/89msInxpDM3k3zC8YAOEiZE/CfnQNJ8x lCdsmqwnAXx7mgIMLIeEjUeJb9WdUp59dri5vuVALsbqXLIh7+LvB94n11U1G9wPx51i skJBgp1rdC95+a8d3VlbtjiKgSf7ExK7IRXSYitoi7LUp10ydSonBAEC3S4OGQMs1PlF m3vQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.147.85 with SMTP id k21mr1388191bkv.24.1354841290314; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:48:10 -0800 (PST) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.205.40.137 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 16:48:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 16:48:10 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: S5gCifb5bvg9pyX4F-7BwXOjsbo Message-ID: Subject: Re: thrift vs thrift2 From: Stack To: HBase Dev List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174a0e62d6144d04d0389185 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174a0e62d6144d04d0389185 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jimmy Xiang wrote: > Since 0.96 is a singularity, is it a time to deprecate thrift finally? > > Or we can use thrift2 by default, and keep thrift around more? > > What's the pros and cons to switch to thrift2? > Interesting notion. Could move thrift2 to thrift altogether. Would need to make sure thrift2 has all from thrift1. St.Ack --0015174a0e62d6144d04d0389185--