hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: thrift vs thrift2
Date Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:01:18 GMT
Logged https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7302 for this.

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Luke Lu <llu@apache.org> wrote:

> The embeded HRegionThriftServer should be ported to thrift2 before we
> deprecate thrift1. FB's (and potentially others) c++ client requires
> HRegionThriftServer.
>
> __Luke
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for deprecation. Will bring any users out of the woodwork who might
> not
> > see this discussion at least.
> >
> > On Friday, December 7, 2012, Jesse Yates wrote:
> >
> > > According to the thrift2 docs, it is the 'right' way to access HBase -
> > the
> > > thrift package is based on an older HBase interface that no longer
> > exists.
> > > Seems like a reasonable case for deprecation in the next release and
> > > dropping it all together after.
> > > -------------------
> > > Jesse Yates
> > > @jesse_yates
> > > jyates.github.com
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net<javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jimmy Xiang <jxiang@cloudera.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Since 0.96 is a singularity, is it a time to deprecate thrift
> > finally?
> > > > >
> > > > > Or we can use thrift2 by default, and keep thrift around more?
> > > > >
> > > > > What's the pros and cons to switch to thrift2?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Interesting notion.  Could move thrift2 to thrift altogether.  Would
> > need
> > > > to make sure thrift2 has all from thrift1.
> > > > St.Ack
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message