hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jesse Yates <jesse.k.ya...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: thrift vs thrift2
Date Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:50:56 GMT
According to the thrift2 docs, it is the 'right' way to access HBase - the
thrift package is based on an older HBase interface that no longer exists.
Seems like a reasonable case for deprecation in the next release and
dropping it all together after.
-------------------
Jesse Yates
@jesse_yates
jyates.github.com


On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jimmy Xiang <jxiang@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > Since 0.96 is a singularity, is it a time to deprecate thrift finally?
> >
> > Or we can use thrift2 by default, and keep thrift around more?
> >
> > What's the pros and cons to switch to thrift2?
> >
>
> Interesting notion.  Could move thrift2 to thrift altogether.  Would need
> to make sure thrift2 has all from thrift1.
> St.Ack
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message