hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From lars hofhansl <lhofha...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: thrift vs thrift2
Date Sat, 08 Dec 2012 04:45:54 GMT
It's quite a useful experiment, though, standing up separate thrift servers adds more complexity
to a deployment.

If it is really abandoned we should just rip it out, no? Otherwise I'd think at least in principle
that is useful (also considering potential future enhancement that we do knowing the thrift
server is in process with the RegionServer).

-- Lars

 From: Stack <stack@duboce.net>
To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org> 
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: thrift vs thrift2
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Luke Lu <llu@apache.org> wrote:

> The embeded HRegionThriftServer should be ported to thrift2 before we
> deprecate thrift1. FB's (and potentially others) c++ client requires
> HRegionThriftServer.

HRTS is an abandoned experiment as I understand it so I closed HBASE-7302,
the issue that would perpetuate it in thrift2.
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message