Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96CF4D06B for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 00:47:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73285 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2012 00:47:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 73234 invoked by uid 500); 28 Oct 2012 00:47:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 73226 invoked by uid 99); 28 Oct 2012 00:47:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 00:47:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.138.91.45] (HELO nm20-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.91.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 00:46:58 +0000 Received: from [98.138.226.176] by nm20.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Oct 2012 00:46:37 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.168] by tm11.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Oct 2012 00:46:37 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1024.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Oct 2012 00:46:37 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 54037.37609.bm@omp1024.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 58261 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Oct 2012 00:46:36 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1351385196; bh=U16nsvxsVZvA5E6vbRVTkeUo4BOKNgADu2fxFPHNA28=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pweCYxWvwX4atzYQHiUKy1s6rDXnJEfz2KWmacEJ7HaNV2mSaZuAMnIJQt6CcRNLQzg51MZR3UVN8z3ZWAPtKTFSzM211ux1vQUR75cWmTskFwDbnhPqPDg0RkkLeT6dyISvwIr9sZdDlMBThJCoGGmZIHBQz/E7/UNVVLW1134= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=x3COBhrKnIMKu2bfxONwkWZeKnLjzHcBFJFEdp/ht93lr0AKRKqQk4hct7b5GtMqAdYRCtM/Ridyn68ToG1fHuaXOU3YA+RCg+BhCsG8j1nKxUN8tn//KNjYFnafZLxm31dObN+iq+xM/25mOTvaiFktPYPT8s87uDy485TPeZM=; X-YMail-OSG: C6A6S4cVM1k.iJKFGZ73PBtWc74J8rK6cv.YMAYYOj7sda0 DmH67KW1BuBFPtcd_LJBo21gzMXDDFr.4PIoH.TJHlCSoI5MBcCB09hsDi6A pQch4ABMW_VJ2X.bfV4BU5rCUEKlJP.yPkSZ5Vd5OlUFEctQeY0tG4EONGkX VYfB4t.10gzeYEUJueEESgAbkaTiNbv4bx5w.EvT3NzS.4HMvFhd84OKkPs5 okPTxKvmmLuDhykB2quclrpxVPGUdFmG89JfaSn3CRnOhanBmWJImPRwvKfD Jd0_jWNdLlvvcv1ooiUfvOEtyBEhHHEJhio5bpQSzmWcfbHSjeEduKPlNnp9 dKzSk_LAFWFZFHQN160d4fDFv1XHLN1AN6fE07Ugwvcp8ZeoL1vOmq5kyLbS N85tWciwoEI4mp_ibyyL6FHvEpdEw_50DMB5zaICXRMRmYY99kHRndpiVUMH vmFlBOcwsBFg07A13Efbw9fZ_9A.KWiBwbo078F9eeiXOmuSQHyTQRnBqca4 XUbRrwjND Received: from [107.3.190.75] by web121705.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 17:46:36 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001,V2UgaGF2ZSBwYXRjaCBub3cgKHdoaWNoIGFsc28gZGlzYWJsZXMgTmFnbGUncyBhbGdvcml0aG0pOiBIQkFTRS03MDA4ClRoZSBxdWVzdGlvbiBpcyBub3c6IFNob3VsZCB3ZSBvbmx5IGRvIHRoaXMgZm9yIDAuOTYgb3IgYWxzbyBmb3IgdGhlIHVwY29taW5nIDAuOTQgcG9pbnQgcmVsZWFzZSAoMC45NC4zKS4KKFNlZSBhbHNvIGRpc2N1c3Npb24gb24gdGhlIGlzc3VlKQoKCi0tIExhcnMKCgoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KIEZyb206IGxhcnMgaG9maGFuc2wgPGxob2ZoYW5zbEABMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.123.450 References: <1350444345.67275.YahooMailNeo@web121704.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1351385196.58134.YahooMailNeo@web121705.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 17:46:36 -0700 (PDT) From: lars hofhansl Reply-To: lars hofhansl Subject: [DISCUSS] Set scanner caching to a better default? HBASE-7008 To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" In-Reply-To: <1350444345.67275.YahooMailNeo@web121704.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1714046436-947243063-1351385196=:58134" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ---1714046436-947243063-1351385196=:58134 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii We have patch now (which also disables Nagle's algorithm): HBASE-7008 The question is now: Should we only do this for 0.96 or also for the upcoming 0.94 point release (0.94.3). (See also discussion on the issue) -- Lars ________________________________ From: lars hofhansl To: hbase-dev Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 8:25 PM Subject: Set scanner caching to a better default? We just ran into this again today, where we forgot to set scanner caching and observed bad performance. The default of 1 does not seem to make any sense (except for very specific case of large/wide rows). Any value between 10 and 1000 should be OK, really. Maybe the default should be 100. This would also go some way to avoid the perception that HBase is slow for folks who are just playing around with it. Thoughts? -- Lars ---1714046436-947243063-1351385196=:58134--