Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FF5BD1D9 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 19:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27230 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2012 19:39:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 27168 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2012 19:39:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 27158 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2012 19:39:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 19:39:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.169] (HELO mail-ob0-f169.google.com) (209.85.214.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 19:39:10 +0000 Received: by obhx4 with SMTP id x4so3982712obh.14 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:38:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Td5PFRuQocwzsiFzyAt0xUdEdfBCcuPYMmdrvtLTfKk=; b=dYxeodvGtYX4qQfnTkPQsruq3mplPtI69EDYGnUQCBCHhhrxzF6uS9g28KHUEVFThE Y92gXVPmeAdqYMfbYhLHFW4+PRLVK6l2Bvy3RQmPK38/0CGccGKdWsnxTtmEpUFOG/Tg 2IJOiFKbsRgH5WLlL2fsKlolGbQhAFKq8qJ/DusaIkK1fKb0FjCtvVsYB3iVnPAyqc0O Z/UqtfveclNWAUVg2DGhf7mPx6v/2t5bqnklX5L/uJhMROExAaJbAyRft9a2dfLYPfgY 81RIQytvZ6i4RvjZ5mO0oIuckR8LrIY/HfuE5E7itSmAiXfqofIaUAXRoRCh+w6zn6uZ ukoQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.30.170 with SMTP id t10mr3545608oeh.10.1346960329259; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:38:49 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.25.201 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:38:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:38:49 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: EMRY11fgbmgTgarRB5er12v16f4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Porting policy from 0.94 to 0.92 From: Stack To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > The same principal should guide 0.94.x, right ? > No. Reread Todd's first note on difference between 0.92 and 0.94 (one is 'old', other is 'current') St.Ack