Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FAB6D2BE for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 20:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89197 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2012 20:14:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 89152 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2012 20:14:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 89142 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2012 20:14:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 20:14:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jesse.k.yates@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.169] (HELO mail-vc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.220.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 20:14:28 +0000 Received: by vcbfl17 with SMTP id fl17so3098339vcb.14 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:14:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=R2tsjL5RcvkpOl4QhnkQek+JrqkRINZqOpGi+GZJFy0=; b=bYRrj/EeRLc1htIQYnZgZMGAQMlewF860q8UcxUkp1qZKqtwndDh6YNmwbRHdWo0qi X2ojDYxEykHyImBuzcwoHGsDkvM++MONj/+pnWpfh+tssaftYatLBkHuYvkrLhhddP9K 7aivEHXrm0hrd9gtQ5Tnv/MjH0Zxgn1IAcGKd7Xu97ai0i4VG3Y8b6iU6zgeQd+kDidG ElaYTJ5ByBGRjSLboOHkRyKCWvxNXn1CEq2vBF875Sq9mJo10SDKZDGPqWemlPROp1rn GqiHVb89aTI5LLjf92G73HXqYnnqbpuEhRKOiSO4eHsRc1ShiT9CMYWPJKp8g35IsK/7 Fv/w== Received: by 10.52.240.225 with SMTP id wd1mr192683vdc.31.1347653648252; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:14:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.182.135 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:13:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jesse Yates Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:13:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: hbase-6055 (snapshots) version in jira. To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307d0620fc002c04c9af10df X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307d0620fc002c04c9af10df Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 That's reasonable to me. Also, given that HBASE-6055 is 'Snapshots in 0.96' (at the moment), seems fine to make the association. -Jesse ------------------- Jesse Yates @jesse_yates jyates.github.com On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote: > Hey all, > > We've started (or will very soon start) committing patches to a github repo > for the snapshot branch (https://github.com/jyates/hbase/tree/snapshots, > likely other forks coming). I've added a component for snapshots to the > jira. I'm considering adding a version (likely the 'hbase-6055' > version/branch) so that when snapshot sub-issues get committed to the > branch, we resolve with that fix version and not have to worry about > muddling the main '0.96' release version until it is merged in. If for > some reason if this doesn't make 0.96, we wouldn't have to do a jira > cleanup pass. If it does, we just add the 0.96 fix version to all those > issues. > > Does this seem ok? Does the name I'm suggesting seem good? (I considered > 'snapshots' but this is confusing IMO because of SNAPSHOT versions and I > didn't want to tie it to a particular version). > > Thanks, > Jon. > > -- > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > // Software Engineer, Cloudera > // jon@cloudera.com > --20cf307d0620fc002c04c9af10df--