Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1B72D576 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:27:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50524 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2012 14:27:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 50437 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2012 14:27:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 50429 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2012 14:27:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:27:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jon@cloudera.com designates 209.85.212.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.41] (HELO mail-vb0-f41.google.com) (209.85.212.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 14:27:37 +0000 Received: by vbkv13 with SMTP id v13so6163891vbk.14 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:27:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=cUzB/jGa6WHmlG/fe23LQl0x/iB2YAnap2mQaZZZmMw=; b=QIVU2ZAAv84c2DsGtUcWEf14Idzlyi8+j4kpZ5+MLbnmDaCYYwpcYbbQy973vuEMKi SUWZY6FY8orxIVFBhhykcNCuuuK97zHU4bWROH7tY/mpPK8FDbOHX4qEb1xnqGbM5aVz g1CQGKYSbQrSWE9z/gDnTtdllxSJkxMx+00p2T6AMwcvhjUcH0SJVabrzeFiMUeLbQS2 KZVyE09Fv7SAwYXLqTKjMxePhyTj3DYrxzklnLnV6JQELQHbdzcS8ieLSd5ZqMfShmR+ eJ5MrHOL+M1anUphUwSfShqWPNpPaH3AlYennX6DGnWCB3VI5j0FI1xT3Xbi/ArPWnVG Jysg== Received: by 10.58.144.232 with SMTP id sp8mr2310353veb.56.1347632836717; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:27:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.94.14 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:26:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jonathan Hsieh Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:26:56 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Notes from yesterday's Contributors Pow Wow [WAS --> Re: HBase Developer's Pow-wow] To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b66fb05852e3404c9aa38d2 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmHr0jG2NB4d7eSeqjWExDi7Q08LQmErIoOkwPkZL/fvWq87SKqGJ1kzzhZiHvESBMP5Ha8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b66fb05852e3404c9aa38d2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Stack wrote: > > + Should there be more friction around committing? > > Suggestion that we try making lieutenants responsible for particular > areas in the code base. These folks would have to +1 anything that > touches their area. Formalize it in JIRA so these folks are > auto-assigned issues when their component is chose. > > I think we had an escape hatch here -- +1 from one of the area experts or two +1's from others outside the area. > Lieutenants do not have to be committers, just someone interested in > an area: e.g. Devaraj volunteered to look after rpc even though not > committer. > > + Should each component have goals or at least a simple design posted; > could help reviewing patches. > > + Who is going to do the all the work? > > Contributors? > > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // jon@cloudera.com --047d7b66fb05852e3404c9aa38d2--