hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: stable HBase branch Was: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available for download
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2012 23:30:22 GMT
I think there seem to be two concepts here (as J-D said in his first
email): stable release vs. stable branch.

So how should we interpret this single stable symlink ?

Thanks

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcryans@apache.org>wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Let's consider the following scenario in chronological order:
> > 0.92.x is released
> > 0.94.y is released
> > 0.92.x+1 is released
> >
> > Would the stable symlink point alternately to each of the releases as
> > they're available ?
>
> That would really not work and I'm sure you can think of a few reasons
> why (like people jumping from 0.94 to 0.92 to 0.94).
>
> >
> > Or should we have two symlinks, one for 0.92 branch, one for 0.94 branch
> ?
>
> Why.
>
> J-D
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message