hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: DISCUSSION: Component Lieutenants?
Date Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:45:44 GMT
Looks good to me.

Though I'm somewhat absent in the code base these days, I'll volunteer
for the nebulous areas of: "filesystem integration" and performance

-Todd

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> Here is the paragraph I will add to the community chapter of our book
> on what I think we worked out by way of policy over the course of this
> discussion.
>
> In the below, I dropped the term 'lieutenant' and instead use 'owner'.
>  Owner is from Todds' recounting of how google does it above.  Owner,
> unlike lieutenant, undoes any implication of hierarchy.
>
>
> PATCH +1'ing POLICY[1]
>
> The below policy is something we put in place 09/2012.  It is a
> suggested policy rather than a hard requirement.  We want to try it
> first to see if it works before we cast it in stone.
>
> HBase is made of components[2].  Components have one or more
> owners[3].  See the 'Description' field on [1] for who the current
> owners are by component.
>
> Patches that fit within the scope of a single HBase component require,
> at least, a +1 by one of the component's owners before commit. If
> owners are absent -- busy or otherwise -- two +1s by non-owners will
> suffice.
>
> Patches that span components need at least two +1s before they can be
> committed, preferably +1s by owners of components touched by the
> x-component patch (TODO: This needs tightening up but I think fine for
> first pass).
>
> Any -1 on a patch by anyone vetos a patch; it cannot be committed
> until the justification for the -1 is addressed.
>
>
> 1. http://search-hadoop.com/m/jtoYcKNU7l1 and
> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/project-config/HBASE/components.
> 3. Link to Component Owners section (follows)
>
>
> COMPONENT OWNERS
>
> Component owners are listed in the description field on this page [1].
> They are listed in the description field rather than in the 'Component
> Lead' field because the latter only allows us list one individual
> whereas components are encouraged to have multiple owners.
>
> Owners are volunteers who are (usually, but not necessarily) expert in
> their component domain and may have an agenda on how they think their
> HBase component should evolve.
>
> Duties:
>
> + Owners will try and review patches that land within their component's scope.
> + If applicable, if an owner has an agenda, they will publish their
> goals or the design toward which they are driving their component
>
> If you would like to be volunteer as a component owner, just write the
> dev list and we'll sign you up. Owners do not need to be committers.
>
>
> Let me know if you'd add or edit above.  Otherwise I'll add it to the
> refguide in next day or so.
>
> St.Ack
> P.S. I will edit the current list of components and add in those who
> have volunteered so far on this thread.  Thanks.



-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Mime
View raw message