hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From yuzhih...@gmail.com
Subject Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available for download
Date Thu, 13 Sep 2012 07:41:57 GMT
Thanks Ram and Rajesh for your work. 

I think we have 3 binding +1's 

I will make the announcement later in the morning. 



On Sep 12, 2012, at 10:58 PM, "Ramkrishna.S.Vasudevan" <ramkrishna.vasudevan@huawei.com>
wrote:

> Tried out the 0.92.2 RC1. 
> 
> Started one Master and two RS.  Inserted data, scanned the data.  Issued
> split operations.  
> Restarted RS, restarted Master, split logs worked fine - got back the data.
> These are the steps we carried out to test the RC.  Thanks to RajeshBabu for
> helping out in this test.
> 
> So +1 from my side on the RC.
> 
> Regards
> Ram
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ted Yu [mailto:yuzhihong@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:46 AM
>> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is
>> available for download
>> 
>> Stack:
>> I take your and J-D's advice.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I went through the following thread:
>>>> Re: ANN: The 2nd hbase 0.94.1 release candidate is available for
>> download
>>>> 
>>>> I didn't see 3 binding +1's on that RC.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> So, Ted, why would you even go back to the old releases to do the
>>> above count up of votes?
>>> 
>>> Are you trying to find fault or holes in the guidance your fellow
>>> committers are giving you?
>>> 
>>> FYI, that's how it comes across.
>>> 
>>> Its understood that you might mess up RMing given this the first time
>>> you are going about it.  We're here to help you over the unknowns
>> (You
>>> might have done a bit of background reading and research on how
>>> previous releases were run, but its fine if you didn't.  We'll
>>> survive).
>>> 
>>> I'd suggest though going forward that you trust the counsel of your
>>> fellow committers, especially when doing something you've plainly not
>>> done before.  You can always blame them later if it turns out to be
>>> ill-advice.  It'll also make it more likely your fellow committers
>>> will want to help you out.
>>> 
>>> St.Ack
>>> 
> 

Mime
View raw message