hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From lars hofhansl <lhofha...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Thoughts about large feature dev branches
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:42:39 GMT
I hope we're not mandating using github or even git.
If a group of folks get together and decide to work together on a feature it should be up
to them to decide how to organize themselves.
If they want to use github (which probably is the most obvious choice) that is fine, but if
they decide to SVN, P4, CVS, Mercurial, bzr (or VisualSourceSafe :) )... That should be up
to them, as long as the end result is a stream of patches that can be applied to the canonical
SVN repository.

-- Lars

----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: Thoughts about large feature dev branches

Yes, the consensus at the dev meetup (a poll of the room) was we
should move forward with use of git and GitHub hosting for feature
development / branches.

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Dave Wang <dsw@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> Shall we move forward with this proposal?  Let's get this in place soon so
> larger projects such as snapshots can make use of this.
> - Dave

Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein (via Tom White)

View raw message