Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C06F4D2CF for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 22:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58065 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2012 22:15:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 57994 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2012 22:15:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 57984 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2012 22:15:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:15:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.169] (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:15:35 +0000 Received: by weys10 with SMTP id s10so760138wey.14 for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:15:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=VhqJmcDdRxB8dM7NVB15VvyUrol6cZPHp/yeLPXHpRY=; b=S9wPKrneDeZI/oTmg25TLZMnHJ+r/oKaOGsswz4vpriIyyPG81QnYyIhJTIlofAKf5 gshe2it9YpVSCZ47MQLI+TBCeUQLvXh4seV90vjSv9BctHnro5rC+JGsSSpuDEJ5n+bC BVaOYbMxgAB+L2R583Au3UdJGQYX5dl9HhED6MaESWCRCgMXMgjRRZJbAf/DjSCYzPoh hmNQEvUEgS7QxEGPca/fPoEpQQEsEkJydq2AgnGMYiEE5QJLlFG+SYwRnmMWL5H7jBdD gzvcXqNyH35XIdLOyZwwGnM+MMmFiDIjVg+9AkrYHt/8ceHzOynphknGNvKu+dn3oteu oSCg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.234.231 with SMTP id s81mr429547weq.34.1344550515015; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.28.202 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:15:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:15:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: behavior of newly created JIRAs From: Ted Yu To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd4d94cd481fa04c6dc8f16 --000e0cd4d94cd481fa04c6dc8f16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The newly created JIRAs seem to be in wrong state. It is advisable to create new JIRA when system gets back to normal. Cheers On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Himanshu Vashishtha < hvashish@cs.ualberta.ca> wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5131 is related. > > Due to this error, there are HBase-6550 has 4-5 duplicates (was > getting an error while creating, but it was getting created at the > backend) > > Himanshu > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > > Hi, > > I noticed a few changes in behavior of newly created JIRAs since last > > night's outage. > > > > 1. I don't see 'Submit Patch' button for them, such as HBASE-6550 > > 2. there is no email notification for them either. > > > > If I am not the only one experiencing the above, I can file an INFRA > ticket > > (or maybe someone can tell me the JIRA number if one exists) > > > > Thanks > --000e0cd4d94cd481fa04c6dc8f16--