Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 086B1DE75 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85103 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2012 23:44:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 85045 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2012 23:44:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 85037 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2012 23:44:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:44:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.169] (HELO mail-ob0-f169.google.com) (209.85.214.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:44:08 +0000 Received: by obhx4 with SMTP id x4so8087971obh.14 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:43:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=S3Fm7H2cxhTzrxP7dmXbrHrcG48/59gsU7sbMmvXm2c=; b=H7NOkYZQvSsE7RD1obTnfg37x5u3TT5dQv5As36RKHoi63jAdftxxQkO74UJU3kI7P f/r9/21IqmqNCYuD2UfzVjXUmZAmivZ8VqvMkuiLjLG3iAvG7JT5Ga4BZaHF4KUsZIL8 clKDwBl1779mp82kKa//RQxj01c68hkTJBfw3Uh6LSykQQFIitq5SPeDH/m2JVsYr7XL PFxVzOlLFitTMdo24ahmA+mfjFxNXYGMEYhHSyZNXmicghOOEDxHHvXhXSm7BPqXvXpW 4pC+34FLTNnPEDCe2jG05I9Fcq8q/Tu6PzeqHD/9MIiGhwWCWZFaF23/hVeXbEG6rEgG tDuA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.131.98 with SMTP id ol2mr9196725obb.69.1346456627916; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:43:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.25.201 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:43:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0990BB16-74B3-404F-8035-BDA4C3757291@hortonworks.com> <0A004195-8223-4D2D-B480-699643C86BDD@hortonworks.com> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:43:47 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WlhOe9Om9gey26IJcF0LApDsa-U Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Discuss] Release 0.92.2? From: Stack To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > bq. Can we not disable tests that we've labelled flakey and not issues in > hbase? > > No tests were disabled this past week. > ? Because 0.92 branch had no flakey tests this week? The last two builds of 0.92 succeeded as did my most recent local build. Maybe its not as bad as I thought. I'll run some more builds up on jenkins and see how it goes. St.Ack