Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DB4BD819 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56612 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2012 17:54:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 56567 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2012 17:54:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 56559 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2012 17:54:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:54:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jon@cloudera.com designates 209.85.212.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.41] (HELO mail-vb0-f41.google.com) (209.85.212.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:54:03 +0000 Received: by vbkv13 with SMTP id v13so4387653vbk.14 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:53:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=RNxbrz2ZBGcRbjUVAY0vSKSHcba4vllmYusIzc7U+5A=; b=K+EmNxcRHd4F09stLySaOHDXuZIKGHzjEwz6Q/ldMie9c1yH4iaB8kcN0yP0lFcdgT /GXDLBuY7BvtwuDYGGkzhBuhsHG16GHd9g48z+nZE1ZkfQ2d3iJlSA4R5WK+7Mdc6D3z LSFGS3RParjVnjj/D5UNr65WwkmxiAJlbHzJyaO5SNv980akM407QeM55iJaoaehTk+6 KnNSGvBLCeHByAaTtHvgKekwVtgZie9iCx7yIWencyK4RTqIow3kgFyXprN4XCL2DRkA 7N3RNhA4/PdYcG1YGyCgfAEmLZ3HtZCiYwrUjD7NfIbVWrCOx8+r6zImmrozOppmz0Nh sOmg== Received: by 10.52.33.15 with SMTP id n15mr5151935vdi.67.1346435622117; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:53:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.94.14 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:53:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Jonathan Hsieh Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:53:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Closing issues (as opposed to Resolving). To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307c9bdcf8218604c893782e X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmw7vr1hKGrwSZ3PZDaFHyvC7WWvtdkjk/s2Jrm0MWBwA3mzPHLuKUZBlgsbLwDb2KUHFWM --20cf307c9bdcf8218604c893782e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey all, I propose that we close issues after a release is done. Close is stronger than resolve -- I believe it makes the issue essentially read only. There are many resolved issues from 0.20, 0.89, and 0.90.6 < that could be closed, (as well as issues from 0.92.1, and 0.94.1.. This would force discussion on old topics to new jiras and make things a little tidier. Thoughts? Jon. -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // jon@cloudera.com --20cf307c9bdcf8218604c893782e--