Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E881D492 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71477 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2012 19:06:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 71422 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2012 19:06:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 71413 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2012 19:06:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:06:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.138.91.38] (HELO nm14-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.91.38) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:06:33 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.49] by nm14.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Aug 2012 19:06:11 -0000 Received: from [98.138.87.2] by tm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Aug 2012 19:06:11 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Aug 2012 19:06:11 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 861246.32489.bm@omp1002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 10522 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Aug 2012 19:06:11 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1345835171; bh=eStsCAFngMW0NvwrMSOMmThizgXI+hDM7AnJ5PjEqlg=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xiAvTKTKnF3wFoI1qwUKRFfGpanNc+ULrZa8pgFXS/qgMqWiUzYIHBfD4MEcUUOSzY+TmMj5OjsElABBfnJB2s6Sr3hDileCs6FBKhrEJAkOqnahC3hOzZWqWXXMALP4kYOKctauZrcROVFga3yNdgKiIaEQ29NouEFY/4q0LxA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=6F9sRywUFD0I7Yg2qIdTA4ujxS34pzgcgSeZJ0C+HI7IrNgkcnNkwOozsoNYOiy6719Ot5OQxjloWTNguZxXixK0Gmwq4B4u2Kkinwox94QMd6OkCc6cnwtYhxuMwYxLi8aS2guH3AgNWE8itu/2lHlZZTBQkG7ExYTQC+fCs94=; X-YMail-OSG: 50LZMfcVM1ml5znGbbU2XWH.geM9spcGgJYZZ7FRAoUb0.1 jgUAMiW8aAKdR8QvAPiIbuTMKkiDyZz8NU_jY5buthypBJCwuHVYUZRCgd1J 5hABcxM0TVmo2MNqrVPkSw0YFLenYyIlbHO5RxtrZbK7Adk0OfH6oI62M5j5 bBTECq0GoEAfQfVtw7IixTspaukqqhchLiCdn8p1xwzoljp4OlKGDiCkYBiH vbo0lzwKbrh._evU2xxCb4AaK.pBSe8gYAaCiAx2FDmmsL_qPFfIIiQi.mQl ntlJW8x84PbXdO6QP_9M6XaZQn8QpoAWY7jX08PWtz9xVY8xhGIw75RDDPbQ tBnMfncsIr2_J1DM9fwJm2BcE8aelWapLDVREVFCV65wNXRNkcyuJVq5zn1s FGJhNwoauRyRS_JSEdGFNcdrnVKuT8zdYTu7oDPGRKeQ32s3bUAtZtCYI09l JgKYpv76xeQNDsZ8hwERdDN6wEAzupDyW35iRsW5ZaoCdlz4VXoU- Received: from [204.14.239.221] by web121702.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:06:11 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.121.416 References: <1345830075.50603.YahooMailNeo@web121706.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1345835171.10031.YahooMailNeo@web121702.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:06:11 -0700 (PDT) From: lars hofhansl Reply-To: lars hofhansl Subject: Re: 0.94.2 To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alright. I created a 0.94.3 release target. If you can, please move all 0.9= 4.x jiras you don't plan to work on soon (within a week or so) to 0.94.3.= =0AI'll do a sweep throughout the next week. Maybe I can cut an RC by the e= nd of next week.=0A=0A=0AThanks.=0A=0A-- Lars=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Mes= sage -----=0AFrom: Elliott Clark =0ATo: dev@hbase.a= pache.org=0ACc: lars hofhansl =0ASent: Friday, August = 24, 2012 11:23 AM=0ASubject: Re: 0.94.2=0A=0AI think the perf improvements = alone would warrant a 0.94.2.=0AHBASE-6602 was pretty critical for us and H= BASE-6603 was a great find.=0A=0ASmaller releases mean more work testing rc= 's but it sure is nice to=0Adebug when the delta is smaller (see HBASE-6577= ).=0A=0AOn Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Stack wrote:= =0A> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:41 AM, lars hofhansl = wrote:=0A>> 0.94.1 has been released two weeks ago. Seeing that it typicall= y takes multiple weeks to tie up a release go through the RC process, in th= e interest of a faster release cycle,=0A>> I would like to start thinking a= bout 0.94.2 now.=0A>> There are 38 improvements and bugfixes against 0.94.2= already, and some of them include important performance fixes.=0A>>=0A>> T= houghts? Keep up the pace? Or slow down?=0A>>=0A>=0A> I'd be up for reviewi= ng an RC.=A0 38 changes easily justifies a point=0A> release and there are = a few corner case regressions whose fixes should=0A> be out sooner rather t= han later.=0A>=0A> St.Ack=0A