Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC13CC44B for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:46:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9321 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2012 08:46:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 9274 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2012 08:46:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 9260 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2012 08:46:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:46:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_REMOTE_IMAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.169] (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:46:05 +0000 Received: by werl57 with SMTP id l57so4464578wer.14 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:45:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Fhhw3hnIsNLaZzUHt/qdgqwpYfSN1H9En2ju8/d8wAc=; b=hqlQMy/AOulOhmAsGOf1AYXDw30YQ3NtRCLMmMZNK/IoIJv59AioY7STJoc5bfHDEy Fvzpk+nKQO/YBb1ZxiLF3EKT/uHQaXW3y0CHFyd3mG16/pNis3u9/CpmxeiqBuL10Psl G5kjP00sCxh4/fAKBmlStJ/YGfFOuaCC60jTTPGcS3Aq7eRA7CN30vtoKk7JbO0gRC6o Xp6/Av31fPR36JZMRwFjnbFYvHhe4U140fJpRmB56nF919ZipaN1p7ZLZBvT6c+5jnQU nArCIvfcO44DLbe1zIIrIpHRAzkJLqdRxyLN4nwS7x2jQ/txOAYlD9k7GHTVV9Pm5DUA dq4w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.98.138 with SMTP id ei10mr36397063wib.1.1341909943720; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.12.205 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:45:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1341893100.66192.YahooMailNeo@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <1341893100.66192.YahooMailNeo@web130101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:45:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: deprecating (old) metrics in favor of metrics2 framework From: Ted Yu To: dev@hbase.apache.org, Otis Gospodnetic Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044267fe84198604c475c1be --f46d044267fe84198604c475c1be Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In another email thread 'HBase 0.94.1', Lars has kindly accepted the motion that deprecating current metric classes be done for 0.94.1 Since 0.94.1 contains critical bug fixes, I want to get public opinion on closing this poll earlier than Friday. Thanks for the understanding. On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > +1 for deprecating and moving to metrics2 faster. > I'd normally make the same argument about deprecating that Lars H. made, > but I think current HBase metrics really need improvement, so if I had > voting power I'd vote to drop old stuff and move to metrics2 ASAP. > > Otis > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Ted Yu > > To: dev@hbase.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2012 10:23 AM > > Subject: deprecating (old) metrics in favor of metrics2 framework > > > > Hi, > > See the following comment for background: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4050?focusedCommentId=13408679&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13408679 > > > > metrics2 framework is in both hadoop 1.0 and hadoop 2.0 > > We would like to migrate to metrics2 framework. But maintaining two > metrics > > frameworks in HBase is costly and results in lower readability. > > > > However, if you have cluster monitoring tool that depends on (old) > metrics > > framework, we want to give you smooth migration experience. > > > > Please provide your opinions on whether (old) metrics framework should be > > deprecated in 0.94 or in 0.96. > > > > Thanks > > > --f46d044267fe84198604c475c1be--