Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-29529-apmail-hbase-dev-archive=hbase.apache.org@hbase.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A91D6D2B8
	for <apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:26:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 33651 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2012 21:26:17 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 33599 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2012 21:26:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@hbase.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@hbase.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@hbase.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.hbase.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org
Received: (qmail 33586 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2012 21:26:16 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:26:16 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.214.169] (HELO mail-ob0-f169.google.com)
 (209.85.214.169)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:26:10 +0000
Received: by obhx4 with SMTP id x4so13929282obh.14
        for <dev@hbase.apache.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=1yvtHQVuHC2Cna2vdOFHAY0UhcKDtH0bH87xXfmBVOQ=;
        b=pC+vvCcfzAxcko/Hcf0+BK6MqDSc2PvlqC6uwdJrWk80BuDVd9rgalykHpJ6qvFzmR
         +onp2jKXnmcg+6BKdou+1WDq/9Lpc7+AcK8XiHdixYM6/NRwQzyNBqylGEzOPP2Juvyi
         +oCZLj/JoZ9nNuG8ZfNYyJ1hIc6IZ+ZOiTJNMTZ7V7+yx6qBQcmT+LU8ddL6C2TQVXKM
         Jj8YAnpIheACiDlEObseUpnrYVoKEKjS96XUrPeJyJFGf0qyAMiEoaa4E1qM5hFykEyt
         wB6/zWXDj3Vo6tDApJ5ifIDmn2JOvXq3Au3cpQ0q3l9xoH3YpEbBk+mlxhK1rRXLvfGE
         1E/w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.164.10 with SMTP id ym10mr25534937obb.75.1343769949790;
 Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.73.5 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAHH9OkC21LXUzKRgcik_gdyPKmrCuQEd27zSn0ZrbgHKG23gQA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAHH9OkC21LXUzKRgcik_gdyPKmrCuQEd27zSn0ZrbgHKG23gQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:25:49 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: NoNOWBiqtMkjnyVE1P2hBbxxO_g
Message-ID: 
 <CADcMMgFN6Spo9=zN6ArVCfBgKzQWAzyqhHy3FSAS3zALEh6a1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SkipFilter javadoc is incorrect
From: Stack <stack@duboce.net>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Shrijeet Paliwal
<shrijeet@rocketfuel.com> wrote:
> Please correct me if I am getting this wrong.
>

Do we have a unit test for SkipFilter?  Does its operation agree or
disagree w/ your finding?  Otherwise, I'd just go w/ your finding
Shrijeet.  Any chance of a patch?

Good on you Shrijeet.

St.Ack