Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+RK=_CzrEwSP=0EbAKRWbxxT0PrCAWTn7brCy5fnNRAUmFz8A@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CALte62yi_NWU0VOZjBrOHqNpJtuuzVELvKn_iH7idj179zKksw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOVjqTq9U+TK09CKsDeTGE2jwXfk7DBv0cO0bO44dg=he4GVKg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALte62z2vD4cEZmffuBUG-5+d+WNw2qJZ4V_5svFEsN4ge7DuA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALte62zjrfDwvH_qhSdd6pfer+hr0RfECvaM2dpBRhgmhiH3vQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJwFCa3rtV4m7GrOGO1+AqKUH6iDst61KMDO7ghDdzLttU2avw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALte62yU_1UwGcwQm+nnaY44w+fbN9tLVss7XGcbaeJJn4XE8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANLc_9LbdGaDB80HdKakYi0LFh6C2bGCPGQZZ7m4cpF0mAY1rw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALte62yYFvyVPvSReKQx0KqEF8Tc0h=GEdOO=P3LEVMyhKEF7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANLc_9Kbtz-bkQtjrFiwV-kbjV-zbuUsAPso1Kk8wX08WNoryw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+RK=_CzrEwSP=0EbAKRWbxxT0PrCAWTn7brCy5fnNRAUmFz8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:54:19 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CA+RK=_A8-Y7+qXGz=ZsKZgSd+hP_sDgCYmn=yrUhCr1s8vAkag@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: porting multi() to zookeeper 3.3
From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Of course I would also venture the opinion that any HBase change which
uses multi() should be considered experimental, as well as use of the
SASL authentication.  On that latter point, use of it is optional. I
would caution us to also implement use of multi for optimization of
MTTR or improvement of region assignment semantics or other related
issues as optional features.

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrot=
e:
> ZooKeeper dev consensus is: "fwiw during the summit meetup we took a
> poll and the consensus was
> that 3.4 should now be considered stable"
>
> So I don't see an issue with depending on 3.4.x. At some point you
> have to make progress.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org>
> Date: Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:18 AM
> Subject: Re: porting multi() to zookeeper 3.3
> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org
> Cc: Jesse Yates <jesse.k.yates@gmail.com>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>> See Jesse's comment:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2611?focusedCommentId=3D1340=
2863&page=3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpane=
l#comment-13402863
>
> Sounds like a reasonable concern. In their shoes I'd probably stick
> with established/stable features as well.
>
> fwiw during the summit meetup we took a poll and the consensus was
> that 3.4 should now be considered stable. Mahadev and I were planning
> to propose the next release (3.4.4) as such. So it shouldn't be long
> to wait if you are interested in using some of the new features.
>
> Patrick
>
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > For Ted's question, developers and ops at the company I mentioned wou=
ld
>>> be
>>> > able to give their answer.
>>>
>>> We have a general policy of not adding new features to fix releases.
>>>
>>> What testing have you done with 3.4.3 that concerns you? Are there
>>> specific outstanding bugs?
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> =A0 =A0- Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein (via Tom White)


--=20
Best regards,

=A0 =A0- Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
Hein (via Tom White)