Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2622ACD41 for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 22:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61460 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2012 22:11:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 61416 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2012 22:11:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 61408 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2012 22:11:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 22:11:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.179] (HELO mail-wi0-f179.google.com) (209.85.212.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 22:10:58 +0000 Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so947201wib.2 for ; Wed, 02 May 2012 15:10:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eTbOgEwvex+c4PnPMoAi7NnGnhZgKOeDU6oDMMpcI7g=; b=F5+lb3D+T92cRyVZj+LAOBE2u6ILiJJv27gD9dI9SemWoqtWlxBqGoievDVyBTnC/x iUEKxOpLV3iUV8IVZodRQ1nTFxwVxSHdA9waVLEXm9wzKif7DW6D27hvcKUdTvQGcQU3 7IlRt9fcH9Ajx6yYRL6YGRtEjR1l9TDel5Wn5ekEUqUuptv43CX9O617JkQrldk9Gxtl zCaI5rA66BJ6xcfAoxKJklj4o4gsmeAP+hyJFZmOegLsuHhSlAIvs+UPvRTchuhsV32R d7HFwezy5PpcHqwzEIid4QWv9hkHGm6KFBRirX/PTp4DfKCt0AkihQKGfXHoKngVkcFD xqWQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.83.198 with SMTP id s6mr17977016wiy.8.1335996638363; Wed, 02 May 2012 15:10:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.196.12 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2012 15:10:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1335914771.79923.YahooMailNeo@web121706.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1335936048.37273.YahooMailNeo@web121703.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 15:10:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for download From: Ted Yu To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0442726c0cfedf04bf14f58b --f46d0442726c0cfedf04bf14f58b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I am surprised to see 0.92.1 exhibit such unfavorable performance profile. Let's see whether cluster testing gives us similar results. On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Elliott Clark wrote: > Sure, sorry about that. > > http://imgur.com/waxlS > > http://www.scribd.com/eclark847297/d/92151092-Hbase-0-94-0-RC3-Local-YCSB-Perf > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > > > Elliot: > > Thanks for the report. > > Can you publish results somewhere else ? > > Attachments were stripped off. > > > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Elliott Clark > >wrote: > > > > > I ran some tests of local filesystem YCSB. I used the 0.90 client for > > > 0.90.6. For the rest of the tests I used 0.92 clients. The results are > > > attached. > > > > > > 0.90 -> 0.94.0RC3 13% faster > > > 0.92 -> 0.94.0RC3 50% faster > > > > > > This seems to be a pretty large performance improvement. I'll run > some > > > tests on a cluster later today. > > > > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:20 PM, lars hofhansl > >wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks Todd. > > >> > > >> I agree with doing source code releases going forward. > > >> > > >> For that, would it be sufficient to just vote against an SVN tag? > > >> Tarballs can then be pulled straight from that tag. > > >> > > >> -- Lars > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > > >> From: Todd Lipcon > > >> To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl > > >> Cc: > > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:35 PM > > >> Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is > available > > >> for download > > >> > > >> +1 from me, I took it for a spin on the local filesystem with some > YCSB > > >> load. > > >> > > >> Here is my signature on the non-secure tarball. > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > >> > > >> iEYEABECAAYFAk+guTIACgkQXkPKua7Hfq9YSQCeMnCQ4XFqLjw+PF8IXNPDug+t > > >> h90AoJ+q4YSg4JbfiCmaXenadWSRU1of > > >> =CdfZ > > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >> > > >> I didn't check out the secure tarball. > > >> > > >> I think for future releases we should do the voting against a source > tar > > >> (ie an svn export) since we now produce multiple binaries, and it's > > easier > > >> to verify that a source tar matches SVN, etc. > > >> > > >> -Todd > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, lars hofhansl > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > The third 0.94.0 RC is available for download here: > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.0-rc3/ > > >> > (My gpg key is available from pgp.mit.edu. Key id: 7CA45750) > > >> > > > >> > HBase 0.94 is a performance release, and there are some interesting > > new > > >> > features as well. > > >> > > > >> > It is wire compatible with 0.92.x. 0.92 clients should work with > 0.94 > > >> > servers and vice versa. > > >> > > > >> > You can do a rolling restart to get your 0.92.x HBase up on this > > >> 0.94.0RC. > > >> > > > >> > The full list of changes is available here: > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12316419 > > >> > > > >> > Please take this RC for a spin, check out the doc, etc, and vote > +1/-1 > > >> by > > >> > May 8th on whether we should release this as 0.94.0. > > >> > > > >> > Thanks. > > >> > > > >> > -- Lars > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Todd Lipcon > > >> Software Engineer, Cloudera > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --f46d0442726c0cfedf04bf14f58b--