Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CA5B9E71 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 01:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86760 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2012 01:41:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 86702 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2012 01:41:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 86691 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2012 01:41:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 01:41:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.139.91.204] (HELO nm5-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 01:41:38 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.64] by nm5.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Apr 2012 01:41:16 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.40] by tm4.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Apr 2012 01:41:16 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1040.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Apr 2012 01:41:16 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 657674.99622.bm@omp1040.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 42652 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Apr 2012 01:41:16 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1334799676; bh=kFyvPBJlFGG+vOi5HBGc8qPCI3bXoTXsjAFptHwDb9M=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=aQJb6A7ea+w42rf+vnb9cI1k/eyp1OdBnG3HR17kaP9CC8LhEqGAPinfzZ8HulMMFGY/K/Yq5sn6phAFU8esVcdoQU+PK3I75xJYRoLBXuw2wKcPtscG4X5tomRdNjqT6sAZUPQkc/sthLwFIQ8PQQyp7P5Zh4MyyZyfw6v3JF8= X-YMail-OSG: wb22ae4VM1k3FP_.g7w.Rf44d9R6mzscAo9g6cupUtMTvRY aaan5hKHnt.C_ghabSAAUqa4XcUxn.H3qQa00OwVHVDqLbDseedqA9DKrzE3 yN0.lFy.UXeEpIA7wHAqZ100s7KeXRSM4MOvC5Yp4bhO3pnSSxbWnpgvBBal YwT5VzIpC2.VE8qETQPp9SGf5n8idHvt18DBmZCNQiH8M2VIaIiE96zXmipf CmOveTEQDtll6U24a34yvMVHqWs3yjYUPmgKA6KXCicXbKFUUX6V9hAfM767 3xTSvmHxrKDA6ybc9WnQqZXaxTILjU.06qssdM3IcJLyqa4VGe450b5jfiPh AdYnEkgmrHVdegWwdXlBnO0E3Y1JC9WVgROjcgm_l49_AMT_xKFutka3QI4. F.M6N_U.2Is.9N.v0KNiXcIbZma._sZmnBz6vrXj1NVaveeS3DrTPk7t3ez7 l Received: from [114.34.53.42] by web164502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:41:16 PDT X-RocketYMMF: apurtell X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.117.340979 References: Message-ID: <1334799676.28961.YahooMailNeo@web164502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:41:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Purtell Reply-To: Andrew Purtell Subject: Re: requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96 To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Only at runtime if you run secure hbase.=0A> St.Ack=0A=0A=0ACorrect.=0A= =0AAdditionally there are two levels of HBase security, if you will:=0A=0A1= ) RPC security: secure RPC engine, Kerberos authentication via SASL, option= al wire encryption via SASL=0A=0A=0A2) Coprocessor based access control at = the HBase column family level=0A=0AYou can opt for none, or #1 and not need= to run ZK 3.4.x.=0A=0AOnly if you opt for #1 and #2 (#2 requires #1), then= you are strongly recommended to run ZK 3.4.x.=0ABest regards,=0A=0A=0A=A0 = =A0 - Andy=0A=0A=0AProblems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting b= ack. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0A= > From: Stack =0A> To: dev@hbase.apache.org=0A> Cc: =0A> = Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 6:46 AM=0A> Subject: Re: requiring zookeeper= 3.4.x in 0.96=0A> =0A> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Ted Yu wrote:=0A>> I want to mention the work Devaraj D is doing in HB= ASE-5732: merging the=0A>> secure RPC engine.=0A>> =0A>> I think the impl= ication of that work is zookeeper 3.4.x would be required=0A>> for 0.96=0A= >> =0A> =0A> Only at runtime if you run secure hbase.=0A> St.Ack=0A>